Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30311322›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

The neuroanatomical basis of the Gambler's fallacy: A univariate and multivariate morphometric study.

Xiaolu Huang, Hanqi Zhang, Chuansheng Chen, Gui Xue, Qinghua He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaolu HuangFaculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Hanqi ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Chuansheng ChenDepartment of Psychology and Social Behaviors, University of California, Irvine, California.
Gui XueNational Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Qinghua HeFaculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6396-6273

Funding

973 Program 2014CB846102Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program for Chongqing Overseas Returned Scholars cx2017049Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities SWU1709106Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities SWU1809003German Research Foundation 61621136008/DFG TRR-169Guangdong Pearl River Talents Plan Innovative and Entrepreneurial Team 2016ZT06S220National Natural Science Foundation of China 31400959National Natural Science Foundation of China 31730038NSFC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human decision-making can be irrational, as in the case of the gambler's fallacy (GF). Converging evidence from behavioral and functional neuroimaging studies has suggested that a hyperactive cognitive system and a hypo-active affective system contribute to the false world model that generates the GF. However, the neuroanatomical basis underlying the GF remains unclear. The current study addressed this issue by collecting high-resolution magnetic resonance anatomical images from a large sample of 350 healthy Chinese adults. Univariate voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis suggested that the gray matter volume (GMV) in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and medial temporal lobe (MTL) (two regions of the cognitive system) showed negative correlations with the degree of GF, while the GMV in the striatum and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC; two regions of the affective system) showed positive correlations. Further multivariate VBM analysis showed that the GMV in these regions could potentially predict the degree of GF. Moreover, a mediation analysis suggested that the GMV in MTL, ACC, and OFC mediated the relationships between the cognitive abilities or affective decision-making performance and the GF. Results of our study help us to understand the potential neural bases of the cognitive system's constructive role and the affective system's destructive role in decision making.

Indexed as

BrainDecision MakingEmotionsFemaleGamblingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adultdecision makingGambler's fallacymediationmultivariate pattern analysisvoxel-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID30311322
PMCPMC6865587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.