Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30311037›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019

Role of closed drain after multi-level posterior spinal surgery in adults: a randomised open-label superiority trial.

Alexander Vadimovich Gubin, Oksana Germanovna Prudnikova, Koushik Narayan Subramanyam, Alexander Vladimirovich Burtsev, Maxim Viktorovich Khomchenkov, Abhishek Vasant Mundargi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Closed-suction drainage in thoracolumbar spinal surgery-clinical routine without evidence? a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Risk-benefit analysis of wound drain usage in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with evidence summary.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Lumbar surgical drains do not increase the risk of infections in patients undergoing spine surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Cervical laminoplasty: indication, technique, complications.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2020
    Review
  18. Observational
  19. The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European spine journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in European spine journal, 2019.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander Vadimovich GubinFederal State Budgetary Institution Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for "Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics", Ministry of Healthcare, Russian Federation, Kurgan, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3234-8936
Oksana Germanovna PrudnikovaScientific and Clinical Laboratory of Axial Skeleton Pathology and Neurosurgery, Head of Trauma and Orthopedic Dept. No 10, Federal State Budgetary Institution Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for "Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics", Ministry of Healthcare, Russian Federation, Kurgan, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1432-1377
Koushik Narayan SubramanyamDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences - Prasanthigram, Puttaparthi, Andhra Pradesh, 515134, India. drkoushik@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5257-9956
Alexander Vladimirovich BurtsevScientific and Clinical Laboratory of Axial Skeleton Pathology and Neurosurgery, Surgeon of Trauma and Orthopedic Dept. No 10, Federal State Budgetary Institution Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for "Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics", Ministry of Healthcare, Russian Federation, Kurgan, Russia.
Maxim Viktorovich KhomchenkovScientific and Clinical Laboratory of Axial Skeleton Pathology and Neurosurgery, Surgeon of Trauma and Orthopedic Dept. No 10, Federal State Budgetary Institution Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for "Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics", Ministry of Healthcare, Russian Federation, Kurgan, Russia.
Abhishek Vasant MundargiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences - Prasanthigram, Puttaparthi, Andhra Pradesh, 515134, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5046-7034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore the role of closed suction drain in multi-level posterior spinal surgery.

methodsWe performed prospective, open-label, randomised control, superiority trial with parallel design and 1:1 allocation. A total of 161 patients undergoing posterior spinal surgery involving more than one motion segment at a dedicated spine surgery department were randomly allocated into "drain" or "no-drain" groups, based on which surgical drain was employed at the end of surgery. After excluding six cases with intraoperative dural tear, the data of 80 patients in "drain" and 75 patients in "no-drain" group were analysed. Primary outcome was total perioperative blood loss (sum of intraoperative blood loss, volume of drain if present and volume aspirated if patient developed collection in relation to surgical wound). The secondary outcomes were transfusion requirements, wound healing and complications.

resultsBoth groups were comparable with respect to baseline characteristics. Total perioperative blood loss was significantly higher in "drain" group (716 ± 312.97 ml vs 377.9 ± 295.72 ml, p < 0.0001). Number and volume of post-operative aspirations were significantly higher in "no-drain" group whereas transfusion requirements were significantly higher in "drain" group. Except for one case of superficial wound inflammation in either group, there were no complications. Subgroup analysis revealed that the results were applicable for surgeries involving "two/three" levels and "more than three" levels.

conclusionsThe practice of not using closed surgical drains after multi-level posterior spinal surgery reduces post-operative blood loss and transfusion requirements. But this comes with the disadvantage of increased wound soakage and need for post-operative wound aspirations. The risks of benefits of "drain" and "no drain" must be carefully weighed and an informed choice be taken. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

DrainageOrthopedic ProceduresBlood TransfusionHumansPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSpineWound HealingClosed suction drainPerioperative blood lossSpine surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.