ReviewCurrent genetics2019
Aggregation and degradation scales for prion-like domains: sequence features and context weigh in.
Review in Current genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generalizable Compositional Features Influencing the Proteostatic Fates of Polar Low-Complexity Domains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Composition-based prediction and rational manipulation of prion-like domain recruitment to stress granules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Protein aggregation in vivo is generally combated by extensive proteostatic defenses. Many proteostasis factors specifically recognize aggregation-prone features and re-fold or degrade the targeted protein. However, protein aggregation is not uncommon, suggesting that some proteins employ evasive strategies to aggregate in spite of the proteostasis machinery. Therefore, in addition to understanding the inherent aggregation propensity of protein sequences, it is important to understand how these sequences affect proteostatic recognition and regulation in vivo. In a recent study, we used a genetic mutagenesis and screening approach to explore the aggregation or degradation promoting effects of the canonical amino acids in the context of G-rich and Q/N-rich prion-like domains (PrLDs). Our results indicate that aggregation propensity scales are strongly influenced by the interplay between specific PrLD features and proteostatic recognition. Here, we briefly review these results and expand upon their potential implications. In addition, a preliminary exploration of the yeast proteome suggests that these proteostatic regulation heuristics may influence the compositional features of native G-rich and Q/N-rich domains in yeast. These results improve our understanding of the features affecting the aggregation and proteostatic regulation of prion-like domains in a cellular context, and suggest that the sequence space for native prion-like domains may be shaped by proteostatic constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.