Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30310987›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2019

Caring for the person with cancer and the role of digital technology in supporting carers.

Natalie Heynsbergh, Mari Botti, Leila Heckel, Patricia M Livingston

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Utility, barriers and facilitators to the use of connected health to support families impacted by paediatric cancer: a qualitative analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Response to: "Caring for the person with cancer and the role of digital technology in supporting carers".Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalie HeynsberghFaculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia. nheynsb@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1847-6862
Mari BottiFaculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia.
Leila HeckelFaculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia.
Patricia M LivingstonFaculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia.
Deakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInformal carers may experience a range of unmet needs during the caring period and, at times, lack support to adequately manage care of the person with cancer and balance personal family and work commitments. The aim of this study was to understand the needs of informal carers of people with cancer and how digital technology may be used to address carers' needs.

methodsFocus groups and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 45 carers. Carers discussed supports and services they used to address their needs, barriers to accessing support, and how digital technology could assist in meeting their needs.

resultsCarers used informal support such as friends and family and formal support including respite and community groups during the caring period. Barriers to accessing support included reluctance to seek external help, sensitivities associated with prioritising carers' needs over patients' needs, and the adequacy of information received. Technology was reported to have the potential to allow carers' privacy to seek support; however, carers' attitudes towards technology differed.

conclusionsCarers require support during the caring period to help balance their own needs with the needs of the person receiving cancer treatment. Digital technology may provide an opportunity to deliver support to carers; however, further research is needed to assess the appropriateness of these interventions to inform improved health outcomes for this vulnerable group.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsSocial SupportYoung AdultCancerCarerDigital technologySupportUnmet needs

Identifiers

PMID30310987
OpenAlexW2896631915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.