Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30310801›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2018

Prognostic influence of 3-dimensional tumor volume on breast cancer compared to conventional 1-dimensional tumor size.

Ki-Tae Hwang, Wonshik Han, Sang Mok Lee, Jaewoo Choi, Jongjin Kim, Jiyoung Rhu, Young A Kim, Dong-Young Noh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ki-Tae HwangDepartment of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6597-3119
Wonshik HanDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sang Mok LeeGangdong Seoul Surgical Clinic, Seoul, Korea.
Jaewoo ChoiHongseong Medical Center, Hongseong, Korea.
Jongjin KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jiyoung RhuDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Young A KimDepartment of Pathology, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Dong-Young NohDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe prognostic influence of 3-dimensional tumor volume (Tv) on breast cancer compared to conventional 1-dimensional tumor size (T) was investigated.

methodsAnalysis was performed on a cohort of 8,996 primary breast cancer patients who were initially diagnosed with TNM stage I-III. Tumor size was defined as the maximum tumor dimension, and Tv was calculated by the equation of (4π × r1 × r2 × r3)/3; r1, r2, and r3 were defined as half of the largest, intermediate, and shortest dimension of the tumor, respectively. Tv was classified into Tv1, Tv2, and Tv3 according to the cut off values of 2.056 cm

resultsThe survival curves according to both the T and Tv categories were clearly differentiated (all P < 0.001), as were those for staging by T and Tv (all P < 0.001). In T1 and T2 tumors, the Tv1 group showed superior survival over the Tv2 group (T1, P < 0.001; T2, P = 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analysis both indicated that Tv was a significant prognostic factor (both P < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under the curves were 0.712 (P < 0.001) for Tv and 0.699 (P < 0.001) for T. Positive correlations were observed between the number of positive nodes and T (coefficient = 0.325; P < 0.001), and between the number of positive nodes and Tv (coefficient = 0.321; P < 0.001).

conclusionTv classification works well for predicting the prognosis of breast cancer, and it is a better predictor than conventional T classification in several aspects. Further studies are needed to validate the practical usefulness of Tv classification in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Breast neoplasmsPrognosisSurvival analysisTumor burden

Identifiers

PMID30310801
PMCPMC6172357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.