Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30310799›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2018

Colonoscopy learning curves for colorectal surgery fellow trainees: experiences with the 15-year colonoscopy training program.

Jung Ryul Oh, Kyung Su Han, Chang Won Hong, Byung Chang Kim, Bun Kim, Sung Chan Park, Min Jung Kim, Sang Jae Lee, Jae Hwan Oh, Changha Shin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jung Ryul OhCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Kyung Su HanCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Chang Won HongCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Byung Chang KimCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Bun KimCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Sung Chan ParkCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Min Jung KimCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Sang Jae LeeCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Jae Hwan OhCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Changha ShinInnovative Medical Engineering & Technology, Division of Convergence Technology, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Dae Kyung SohnCenter for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3296-6646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to analyze the learning curves for colorectal surgery fellows in a colonoscopy training program.

methodsBetween May 2003 and February 2017, 60 surgical fellows joined our 1-year colonoscopy training program as trainees and performed 43,784 cases of colonoscopy. All trainees recorded their colonoscopy experiences prospectively into the database. After excluding 6 trainees, who had experience with performing more than 50 colonoscopies before participating in our training program or who discontinued our training program with experience performing less than 300 colonoscopies, this study included 54 trainees who had performed 39,539 colonoscopy cases. We analyzed the cecal intubation rate (CIR) and cecal intubation time (CIT) using the cumulative sum (Cusum) technique and moving average method to assess the technical colonoscopy competence.

resultsOverall, the CIR by the trainees was 80.7%. The median number of cases of colonoscopy performed during the training period for each trainee was 696 (range, 322-1,669). The trainees were able to achieve a 90% CIR with 412 and 493 procedures when analyzed using the moving average and the Cusum, respectively. Using the moving average method, CIRs after 150, 300, and 400 procedures were 67.0%, 84.1%, and 89.2%, respectively. The CIT of trainees continuously decreased until 400 successful cases. Median CITs were 9.4, 8.3, and 7.4 minutes at 150, 300, and 400 successful cases, respectively.

conclusionWe found that more than 400 cases of experience were needed for technical competence in colonoscopy. Continuous teaching and monitoring is required until trainees become sufficiently competent.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyLearning curveSurgeryTraining

Identifiers

PMID30310799
PMCPMC6172355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.