ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2018
Colonoscopy learning curves for colorectal surgery fellow trainees: experiences with the 15-year colonoscopy training program.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- EFFICACY OF WATER INFUSION VERSUS AIR/CO2 INSUFFLATION FOR COLONOSCOPY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2026Pooled it
- Adenoma Detection Rates: Does Endoscopic Volume or Provider Specialty Matter More?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Adenoma per polypectomy as a training metric in colonoscopy: a retrospective analysis of trainee progression compared to expert performance.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- Current status of endoscopy training for surgeons in Korea: a narrative review.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2025Review
- Analysis of adenoma detection rate of colonoscopy among trainees.Annals of coloproctology · 2024Article
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Identification of gaze pattern and blind spots by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using an eye-tracking technique.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Guidelines for accreditation of endoscopy units: quality measures from the Korean Society of Coloproctology.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2021Article
- The impact of sedation on quality metrics of colonoscopy: a single-center experience of 48,838 procedures.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Article
- Validation of an automated adenoma detection rate calculating system for quality improvement of colonoscopy.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to analyze the learning curves for colorectal surgery fellows in a colonoscopy training program.
methodsBetween May 2003 and February 2017, 60 surgical fellows joined our 1-year colonoscopy training program as trainees and performed 43,784 cases of colonoscopy. All trainees recorded their colonoscopy experiences prospectively into the database. After excluding 6 trainees, who had experience with performing more than 50 colonoscopies before participating in our training program or who discontinued our training program with experience performing less than 300 colonoscopies, this study included 54 trainees who had performed 39,539 colonoscopy cases. We analyzed the cecal intubation rate (CIR) and cecal intubation time (CIT) using the cumulative sum (Cusum) technique and moving average method to assess the technical colonoscopy competence.
resultsOverall, the CIR by the trainees was 80.7%. The median number of cases of colonoscopy performed during the training period for each trainee was 696 (range, 322-1,669). The trainees were able to achieve a 90% CIR with 412 and 493 procedures when analyzed using the moving average and the Cusum, respectively. Using the moving average method, CIRs after 150, 300, and 400 procedures were 67.0%, 84.1%, and 89.2%, respectively. The CIT of trainees continuously decreased until 400 successful cases. Median CITs were 9.4, 8.3, and 7.4 minutes at 150, 300, and 400 successful cases, respectively.
conclusionWe found that more than 400 cases of experience were needed for technical competence in colonoscopy. Continuous teaching and monitoring is required until trainees become sufficiently competent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.