Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30310744›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2018

A new species of the odorous frog genus

Shize Li, Ning Xu, Jingcai Lv, Jianping Jiang, Gang Wei, Bin Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. First description on female and tadpole ofBiodiversity data journal · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A new species ofBiodiversity data journal · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A new species ofZooKeys · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A new species ofZooKeys · 2021
    Article
  14. A species of the genusZooKeys · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Two newZooKeys · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shize LiDepartment of Food Science and Engineering, Maotai University, Renhuai, Guizhou, China.
Ning XuDepartment of Food Science and Engineering, Maotai University, Renhuai, Guizhou, China.
Jingcai LvGuizhou Institute of Biology, Guizhou Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Jianping JiangCAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Gang WeiBiodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory, Guiyang College, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Bin WangCAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chengdu Institute of Biology · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNGuizhou Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genus

Indexed as

Mitochondrial DNAMorphologyNuclear DNAOdorrana kweichowensis sp. nov.Phylogenetic analysesSouthwestern ChinaTaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID30310744
PMCPMC6174872
OpenAlexW2894916546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.