Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30310546›Full record

ReviewComparative cytogenetics2018

The karyotypes and evolution of ZZ/ZW sex chromosomes in the genus

Marcela Baer Pucci, Viviane Nogaroto, Luiz Antonio Carlos Bertollo, Orlando Moreira-Filho, Marcelo Ricardo Vicari

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comparative cytogenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Against the mainstream: exceptional evolutionary stability of ZW sex chromosomes across the fish families Triportheidae and Gasteropelecidae (Teleostei: Characiformes).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative cytogenetics amongComparative cytogenetics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcela Baer PucciDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, Km 235, 13565-905, São Carlos, São Paulo State, Brazil Universidade Federal de São Carlos São Carlos Brazil.
Viviane NogarotoDepartamanento de Biologia Estrutural, Molecular e Genética, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Av. Carlos Cavalcanti, 4748, 84030-900, Ponta Grossa, Paraná State, Brazil Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa Ponta Grossa Brazil.
Luiz Antonio Carlos BertolloDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, Km 235, 13565-905, São Carlos, São Paulo State, Brazil Universidade Federal de São Carlos São Carlos Brazil.
Orlando Moreira-FilhoDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, Km 235, 13565-905, São Carlos, São Paulo State, Brazil Universidade Federal de São Carlos São Carlos Brazil.
Marcelo Ricardo VicariDepartamanento de Biologia Estrutural, Molecular e Genética, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Av. Carlos Cavalcanti, 4748, 84030-900, Ponta Grossa, Paraná State, Brazil Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa Ponta Grossa Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3913-9889
Universidade Federal de São Carlos · BRUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Available data on cytotaxonomy of the genus

Indexed as

Chromosomal differentiationCryptic speciesRepetitive DNASpeciation genes

Identifiers

PMID30310546
PMCPMC6177511
OpenAlexW2895226581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.