ArticleJournal of genomics2018
Isolation and genomic characterization of six endophytic bacteria isolated from
Article in Journal of genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pseudocitrobacter cyperus, a novel bacterial species recovered from Cyperus alternifolius in Egypt.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Bioactive potentiality of secondary metabolites from endophytic bacteria against SARS-COV-2: An in-silico approach.PloS one · 2022Article
- Advancement in the molecular perspective of plant-endophytic interaction to mitigate drought stress in plants.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Assessing the Bacterial Community Composition of Bivalve Mollusks Collected in Aquaculture Farms and Respective Susceptibility to Antibiotics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Bioprospecting of endophytic microorganisms for bioactive compounds of therapeutic importance.Archives of microbiology · 2021Review
- The Quest for Novel Antimicrobial Compounds: Emerging Trends in Research, Development, and Technologies.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Six endophytic bacteria were isolated from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.