Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30310522›Full record

ArticleJournal of Cancer2018

Risk of upgrading from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy pathology: Is magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy more accurate?

Ning Xu, Yu-Peng Wu, Xiao-Dong Li, Min-Yi Lin, Qing-Shui Zheng, Shao-Hao Chen, Jun-Feng Li, Yong Wei, Xue-Yi Xue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The prognostic value ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CanEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ning XuDepartments of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.
Yu-Peng WuDepartments of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.
Xiao-Dong LiDepartments of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.
Min-Yi LinDepartments of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.
Qing-Shui ZhengDepartments of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.
Shao-Hao ChenDepartments of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.
Jun-Feng LiDepartments of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.
Yong WeiDepartments of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.
Xue-Yi XueDepartments of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.
Fujian Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Gleason score upgrading.MRIprostate biopsyprostatectomy specimensystematic biopsy

Identifiers

PMID30310522
PMCPMC6171015
OpenAlexW2889870105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.