ArticleClinical epidemiology2018
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and cardiovascular events in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and multiple myeloma.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and red blood cell transfusion with venous thrombosis in patients with cancer: a nationwide case-crossover study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors for anemia in chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Global burden of venous thromboembolism: incidence and outcome estimates of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Advances in the pathophysiology and treatment of anaemia in multiple myeloma.Current opinion in hematology · 2026Review
- Role of Population Based Studies in Advancing our Knowledge of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2025Review
- Thrombosis in Myeloid Malignancies: From CHIP to AML.Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets · 2024Review
- Targeting Stress Erythropoiesis Pathways in Cancer.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Prediction of Response to Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents in Low-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- Management of Adverse Events and Supportive Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Cancers · 2021Review
- Cerebrovascular manifestations in hematological diseases: an update.Journal of neurology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionErythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment has been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with solid tumors and with an increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease. The ESA-related risk in patients with hematological neoplasms remains unclear. We, therefore, aimed to assess the ESA-related risk of VTE, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a population-based cohort study in Denmark, using medical databases to identify 2,114 MDS patients and 3,105 MM patients diagnosed in 2004-2013. Incidence rates per 1,000 person-years and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for VTE, MI, and stroke associated with ESA treatment were computed. HRs were calculated in time-dependent Cox regression and adjusted for age, sex, MDS prognosis group, comorbidities, and treatments.
resultsIncidence rates per 1,000 person-years for VTE, MI, and stroke were 10.8, 8.2, and 16.0 in MDS patients, and 21.9, 10.2 and 9.9 in MM patients without ESA treatment, respectively. MDS patients with ESA treatment had a 1.6-fold increased risk of MI (HR 1.60 [95% CI 0.90-2.86]) and an almost twofold increased risk of stroke (HR 1.94 [95% CI 1.28-2.94]). Adjusted HR for VTE was 1.04 (95% CI 0.57-1.89) compared with MDS patients without ESAs. In MM patients with ESAs compared with patients without ESAs, HRs were 1.41 (95% CI 0.96-2.08) for VTE, 1.23 (95% CI 0.68-2.20) for MI, and 1.63 (95% CI 0.96-2.77) for stroke.
conclusionESA use was associated with stroke in MDS patients. Among MM patients, ESA treatment was associated with a higher risk of all cardiovascular events, although all CIs included equivalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.