Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30310277›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2018

Comparative effects of magnetic and water-based hyperthermia treatments on human osteosarcoma cells.

Dumitru-Daniel Herea, Camelia Danceanu, Ecaterina Radu, Luminita Labusca, Nicoleta Lupu, Horia Chiriac

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Fe-Cr-Nb-B Ferrofluid for Biomedical Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dumitru-Daniel HereaMDM Department, National Institute of Research and Development for Technical Physics, Iasi, Romania, dherea@phys-iasi.ro.
Camelia DanceanuMDM Department, National Institute of Research and Development for Technical Physics, Iasi, Romania, dherea@phys-iasi.ro.
Ecaterina RaduMDM Department, National Institute of Research and Development for Technical Physics, Iasi, Romania, dherea@phys-iasi.ro.
Luminita LabuscaMDM Department, National Institute of Research and Development for Technical Physics, Iasi, Romania, dherea@phys-iasi.ro.
Nicoleta LupuMDM Department, National Institute of Research and Development for Technical Physics, Iasi, Romania, dherea@phys-iasi.ro.
Horia ChiriacMDM Department, National Institute of Research and Development for Technical Physics, Iasi, Romania, dherea@phys-iasi.ro.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHyperthermia (HT) based on magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) represents a promising approach to induce the apoptosis/necrosis of tumor cells through the heat generated by MNPs submitted to alternating magnetic fields. However, the effects of temperature distribution on the cancer cells' viability as well as heat resistance of various tumor cell types warrant further investigation.

methodsIn this work, the effects induced by magnetic hyperthermia (MHT) and conventional water-based hyperthermia (WHT) on the viability of human osteosarcoma cells at different temperatures (37°C-47°C) was comparatively investigated. Fe-Cr-Nb-B magnetic nanoparticles were submitted either to alternating magnetic fields or to infrared radiation generated by a water-heated incubator.

resultsIn terms of cell viability, significant differences could be observed after applying the two HT treatment methods. At about equal equilibrium temperatures, MHT was on average 16% more efficient in inducing cytotoxicity effects compared to WHT, as assessed by MTT cytotoxicity assay.

conclusionWe propose the phenomena can be explained by the significantly higher cytotoxic effects initiated during MHT treatment in the vicinity of the heat-generating MNPs compared to the effects triggered by the homogeneously distributed temperature during WHT. These in vitro results confirm other previous findings regarding the superior efficiency of MHT over WHT and explain the cytotoxicity differences observed between the two antitumor HT methods.

Indexed as

MagneticsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalHumansHyperthermia, InducedInfrared RaysMagnetic FieldsNanoparticlesOsteosarcomaTemperatureWaterWatercancer cellsmagnetic hyperthermiamagnetic nanoparticleswater-based hyperthermia

Identifiers

PMID30310277
PMCPMC6165779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.