Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30310233›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2019

Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations.

Sudeep Pushpakom, Francesco Iorio, Patrick A Eyers, K Jane Escott, Shirley Hopper, Andrew Wells, Andrew Doig, Tim Guilliams, Joanna Latimer, Christine McNamee and 4 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2,303 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,303citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05641246 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Topical Diclofenac on Clinical Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Capecitabine: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorGerman University in CairoRan2022 to 2023Enrolled86ConditionsHand and Foot SyndromeArms(CARBAMIDE®), (VOLTAREN®) Emulgel 1%
NCT05671497 phase2 / phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effect of Cilostazol on the Clinical Outcomes of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled70ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsCilostazol 100 MG, conventional synthetic antirheumatic drugs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,303 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Repurposing antifolates as G9a methyltransferase inhibitors for potential Alzheimer's disease therapeutics via 3D QSAR/pharmacophore mapping and experimental validations.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2,243 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sudeep PushpakomMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Francesco IorioWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Patrick A EyersDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
K Jane EscottEmerging Innovations Unit, Scientific Partnering and Alliances, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Shirley HopperLicensing Division, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), London, UK.
Andrew WellsHarrison Goddard Foote, Patent and Trademark Attorneys, Manchester, UK.
Andrew DoigManchester Institute of Biotechnology and Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Tim GuilliamsHealx Ltd., St John's Innovation Centre, Cambridge, UK.
Joanna LatimerMedical Research Council, London, UK.
Christine McNameeMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Alan NorrisMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Philippe SanseauMedicines Research Centre, Target Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, UK.
David CavallaNumedicus Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Munir PirmohamedMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G120/1030Medical Research Council MR/L006758/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the high attrition rates, substantial costs and slow pace of new drug discovery and development, repurposing of 'old' drugs to treat both common and rare diseases is increasingly becoming an attractive proposition because it involves the use of de-risked compounds, with potentially lower overall development costs and shorter development timelines. Various data-driven and experimental approaches have been suggested for the identification of repurposable drug candidates; however, there are also major technological and regulatory challenges that need to be addressed. In this Review, we present approaches used for drug repurposing (also known as drug repositioning), discuss the challenges faced by the repurposing community and recommend innovative ways by which these challenges could be addressed to help realize the full potential of drug repurposing.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryDrug IndustryDrug RepositioningHumans

Identifiers

PMID30310233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.