Assessing a training programme for primary care dental practitioners in endodontics of moderate complexity: Pilot data on skills enhancement and treatment outcomes.

Aims: To explore the impact of dedicated training to extend the skills of primary care practitioners on the quality of endodontic care, using clinical, radiographic and patient-related outcomes. Methods: The quality of endodontic treatment performed at the beginning and end of training to become dentists with extended skills (DES) in endodontics was assessed in vitro and in vivo from endo-training blocks and self-reported logbooks containing clinical notes and radiographs respectively. The quality of endodontic care delivered by DES post-training was measured using clinical and radiographic outcomes. Patient-related outcomes were assessed using a self-report questionnaire, including the Oral Health Impact Profile – Endodontic Outcome Measure (OHIP-EOM). Results: Data on eight dentists were examined pre-and post-training, five of whom participated in further follow-up investigations on the quality of endodontic care delivered to their patients. Significant improvements in skills were seen for all domains in vitro (p <0.05), and for all domains of the clinical treatment process, and achieving the correct working length of the root filling as seen by radiography in vivo (p <0.05). The quality of the clinical process was maintained following training. Positive patient outcome (OHIP-EOM) scores were recorded (mean score of 34.72, SD = 10.74, n = 120 pre-treatment and 25.85, SD = 7.74, n = 47 representing reduced impact at follow-up). The majority of patients reported being satisfied, or very satisfied, with the service they received (72.5%, n = 98); would use the service again (68.1%, n = 92); and would recommend the service to friends and family (74.8%, n = 101). Conclusions: Findings suggest that training for dentists working in practice can be successful in enhancing skills and changing practice, with evidence of high patient satisfaction and good clinical and patient-related outcomes. Pilot results must be interpreted with caution and further research is required.