Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30310099›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

The effect of breastmilk and saliva combinations on the in vitro growth of oral pathogenic and commensal microorganisms.

E L Sweeney, S S Al-Shehri, D M Cowley, H G Liley, N Bansal, B G Charles, P N Shaw, J A Duley, C L Knox

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Antimicrobial Properties of Colostrum and Milk.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Oral microbiome: possible harbinger for children's health.International journal of oral science · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

E L SweeneyThe Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Faculty of Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4059, Australia. el.sweeney@qut.edu.au.
S S Al-ShehriSchool of Applied Medical Science, Taif University, Taif, 21974, Saudi Arabia.
D M CowleyMater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia.
H G LileyMater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia.
N BansalSchool of Pharmacy, PACE, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Australia.
B G CharlesSchool of Pharmacy, PACE, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Australia.
P N ShawSchool of Pharmacy, PACE, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Australia.
J A DuleySchool of Pharmacy, PACE, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Australia.
C L KnoxThe Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Faculty of Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 4059, Australia.
University of Queensland · AUQueensland University of Technology · AUMater Research · AUTaif University · SA

Funding

Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1043282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonates are exposed to microbes in utero and at birth, thereby establishing their microbiota (healthy microbial colonisers). Previously, we reported significant differences in the neonatal oral microbiota of breast-fed and formula-fed babies after first discovering a primal metabolic mechanism that occurs when breastmilk (containing the enzyme xanthine oxidase) and neonatal saliva (containing highly elevated concentrations of the substrates for xanthine oxidase: xanthine and hypoxanthine). The interaction of neonatal saliva and breast milk releases antibacterial compounds including hydrogen peroxide, and regulates the growth of bacteria. Using a novel in vitro experimental approach, the current study compared the effects of this unique metabolic pathway on a range of bacterial species and determined the period of time that microbial growth was affected. We demonstrated that microbial growth was inhibited predominately, immediately and for up to 24 hr following breastmilk and saliva mixing; however, some microorganisms were able to recover and continue to grow following exposure to these micromolar amounts of hydrogen peroxide. Interestingly, growth inhibition was independent of whether the organisms possessed a catalase enzyme. This study further confirms that this is one mechanism that contributes to the significant differences in the neonatal oral microbiota of breast-fed and formula-fed babies.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMilk, HumanSalivaAdultBacteriaFemaleHumansHydrogen PeroxideMouthHydrogen Peroxide

Identifiers

PMID30310099
PMCPMC6181944
OpenAlexW2894626234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.