Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30309994›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Is care based on comprehensive geriatric assessment with mobile teams better than usual care? A study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (The GerMoT study).

Anne Wissendorff Ekdahl, Anna Axmon, Magnus Sandberg, Katarina Steen Carlsson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02923843 (Are Care Given by a Geriatric Hospital-Based Out Patient-Care Team Better Than Usual Care? - a Randomised Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02923843 nacompletednot on this map

Are Care Given by a Geriatric Hospital-Based Out Patient-Care Team Better Than Usual Care? - a Randomised Controlled Trial (The GerOP-Ca-trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2016 to 2020Enrolled450ConditionsElderly, FrailArmsComprehensive Geriatric Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Oncology Patients to Guide Treatment Decisions and Predict Chemotherapy Toxicity.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne Wissendorff EkdahlDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institute (KI), Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8677-176X
Anna AxmonDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lunds University, Lund, Sweden.
Magnus SandbergDepartment of Health Sciences, Lunds Universitet, Lund, Sweden.
Katarina Steen CarlssonThe Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SESwedish Institute for Health Economics · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionComprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional, interdisciplinary diagnostic process used to determine the medical, psychological and functional capabilities of frail older people. The primary aim of our current study is to confirm whether CGA-based outpatient care is superior than usual care in terms of health-related outcomes, resource use and costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Geriatric Mobile Team trial is designed as a single-centre randomised, controlled, assessor-blinded (at baseline) trial. All participants will be identified via local healthcare registries with the following inclusion criteria: age ≥75 years, ≥3 different diagnoses and ≥3 visits to the emergency care unit (with or without admittance to hospital) during the past 18 months. Nursing home residency will be an exclusion criterion. Baseline assessments will be done before the 1:1 randomisation. Participants in the intervention group will, after an initial CGA, have access to care given by a geriatric team in addition to usual care. The control group receives usual care only. The primary outcome is the total number of inpatient days during the follow-up period. Assessments of the outcomes: mortality, quality of life, health care use, physical functional level, frailty, dependence and cognition will be performed 12 and 24 months after inclusion. Both descriptive and analytical statistics will be used, in order to compare groups and for analyses of outcomes over time including changes therein. The primary outcome will be analysed using analysis of variance, including in-transformed values if needed to achieve normal distribution of the residuals. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained and the results will be disseminated in national and international journals and to health care leaders and stakeholders. Protocol amendments will be published in ClinicalTrials.gov as amendments to the initial registration NCT02923843. In case of success, the study will promote the implementation of CGA in outpatient care settings and thereby contribute to an improved care of older people with multimorbidity through dissemination of the results through scientific articles, information to politicians and to the public. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02923843; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareGeriatric AssessmentPatient Care TeamAgedCognitionDisability EvaluationFrailtyGeriatricsHospitalizationHumansMortalityQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSwedenComprehensive Geriatric AssessmentFrailtyGeriatric MedicineOut-patient CareRandomised Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID30309994
PMCPMC6252639
OpenAlexW2896903999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.