Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30309361›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2018

Secure top most significant genome variants search: iDASH 2017 competition.

Sergiu Carpov, Thibaud Tortech

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. HySec-Flow: Privacy-Preserving Genomic Computing with SGX-based Big-Data Analytics Framework.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sergiu CarpovCEA, LIST, Point Courrier 172, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, 91191, France. sergiu.carpov@cea.fr.
Thibaud TortechCEA, LIST, Point Courrier 172, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, 91191, France.

Funding

SERGEANT: SEcuRe GEnome Analysis competitionR13HG009072 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2016 to 2019
$65k
NHGRI NIH HHS R13 HG009072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the 3 tracks of iDASH Privacy & Security Workshop 2017 competition was to execute a whole genome variants search on private genomic data. Particularly, the search application was to find the top most significant SNPs (Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms) in a database of genome records labeled with control or case. In this paper we discuss the solution submitted by our team to this competition.

methodsPrivacy and confidentiality of genome data had to be ensured using Intel SGX enclaves. The typical use-case of this application is the multi-party computation (each party possessing one or several genome records) of the SNPs which statistically differentiate control and case genome datasets.

resultsOur solution consists of two applications: (i) compress and encrypt genome files and (ii) perform genome processing (top most important SNPs search). We have opted for a horizontal treatment of genome records and heavily used parallel processing. Rust programming language was employed to develop both applications.

conclusionsExecution performance of the processing applications scales well and very good performance metrics are obtained. Contest organizers selected it as the best submission amongst other received competition entries and our team was awarded the first prize on this track.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityGenomeAlgorithmsHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProgramming LanguagesSoftwareGenome variants searchGenomic data privacyIDASH competitionIntel SGX

Identifiers

PMID30309361
PMCPMC6180353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.