Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30309316›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2018

General practitioners' continuation and acceptance of medication changes at sectorial transitions of geriatric patients - a qualitative interview study.

Anja G Strehlau, Michael Due Larsen, Jens Søndergaard, Anna B Almarsdóttir, Jens-Ulrik Rosholm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anja G StrehlauGeriatric Department, Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000, Odense C, Denmark. strehlau@hotmail.com.
Michael Due LarsenCentre for Clinical Epidemiology, Odense University Hospital, and Research Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jens SøndergaardInstitute of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Anna B AlmarsdóttirDepartment of Pharmacy, Social and Clinical Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens-Ulrik RosholmGeriatric Department, Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollow-up in general practice on medication initiated during hospitalisation is often perceived to be inadequate, which leads to unintended drug interaction and over- or underdosage of medication. Little is known about General Practitioners (GPs') views on medication changes during the transition from hospital to primary care. We conducted a qualitative interview study to understand GPs' views on the medication changes made for their patients by hospital physicians in a geriatric ward and the GPs' actions after discharge.

methodsQualitative semi-structured interviews comprising ten GPs from general practices in the Region of Southern Denmark, using a phenomenological approach. The GPs were selected strategically based on the principle of maximum variation. The analysis process was a cross-sectional analysis based on a phenomenological analysis.

resultsThe GPs identified many reasons for the lack of medication continuation, including miscommunication between hospital doctors and GPs and delayed discharge letters. Several factors were involved, including patients not taking responsibility for their medication, no structure for follow-up visits to their GPs and for the renewal of their prescriptions.

conclusionThe main reason for the poor continuity of medication changes for geriatric patients at sector transition was neither the GPs' deliberate actions of removing the patients' medications, nor the patients' lack of compliance or of willingness to take the medication. It is largely due to procedural errors in the follow-up on the patient after discharge, due to the lack of a structured process and due to miscommunication between the primary sector and the hospital.

Indexed as

AftercareAttitude of Health PersonnelDrug TherapyGeneral PractitionersTransitional CareAmbulatory CareCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkGeriatricsHospitalistsHospitalizationHumansPatient DischargePatient Discharge SummariesQualitative ResearchDrug prescriptionsFollow-up careGeneral practitionersGeriatricsMesh compliantPatient discharge summariesTransitional care

Identifiers

PMID30309316
PMCPMC6182783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.