Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30309315›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2018

Association genetics of acetophenone defence against spruce budworm in mature white spruce.

Mebarek Lamara, Geneviève J Parent, Isabelle Giguère, Jean Beaulieu, Jean Bousquet, John J MacKay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic variation ofEuropean journal of forest research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The long road to bloom in conifers.Forestry research · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mebarek LamaraForest Research Centre and Institute for Systems and Integrative Biology, Département des sciences du bois et de la forêt, Université Laval, Qc, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada. mebarek.lamara.1@ulaval.ca.
Geneviève J ParentDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK.
Isabelle GiguèreForest Research Centre and Institute for Systems and Integrative Biology, Département des sciences du bois et de la forêt, Université Laval, Qc, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Jean BeaulieuForest Research Centre and Institute for Systems and Integrative Biology, Département des sciences du bois et de la forêt, Université Laval, Qc, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Jean BousquetForest Research Centre and Institute for Systems and Integrative Biology, Département des sciences du bois et de la forêt, Université Laval, Qc, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
John J MacKayForest Research Centre and Institute for Systems and Integrative Biology, Département des sciences du bois et de la forêt, Université Laval, Qc, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Université Laval · CAUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutbreaks of spruce budworm (SBW, Choristoneura fumiferana Clem.) cause major recurrent damage in boreal conifers such as white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) and large losses of forest biomass in North America. Although defensive phenolic compounds have recently been linked to chemical resistance against SBW, their genetic basis remains poorly understood in forest trees, especially in conifers. Here, we used diverse association genetics approaches to discover genes and their variants that may control the accumulation of acetophenones, and dissect the genetic architecture of these defence compounds against SBW in white spruce mature trees.

resultsOut of 4747 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 2312 genes genotyped in a population of 211 unrelated individuals, genetic association analyses identified 35 SNPs in 33 different genes that were significantly associated with the defence traits by using single-locus, multi-locus and multi-trait approaches. The multi-locus approach was particularly effective at detecting SNP-trait associations that explained a large fraction of the phenotypic variance (from 20 to 43%). Significant genes were regulatory including the NAC transcription factor, or they were involved in carbohydrate metabolism, falling into the binding, catalytic or transporter activity functional classes. Most of them were highly expressed in foliage. Weak positive phenotypic correlations were observed between defence and growth traits, indicating little or no evidence of defence-growth trade-offs.

conclusionsThis study provides new insights on the genetic architecture of tree defence traits, contributing to our understanding of the physiology of resistance mechanisms to biotic factors and providing a basis for the genetic improvement of the constitutive defence of white spruce against SBW.

Indexed as

AcetophenonesAnimalsMothsPhenolPiceaPolymorphism, Single NucleotideacetophenoneAcetophenonesPhenolAssociation geneticsMetabolic trade-offsPgβglu-1 expressionPhenolic compoundsSpruce budwormWhite spruce

Identifiers

PMID30309315
PMCPMC6182838
OpenAlexW2897706920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.