Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30309227›Full record

ArticleJournal of stroke2018

Consensus Guides on Stroke Thrombolysis for Anticoagulated Patients from Japan: Application to Other Populations.

Kazunori Toyoda, Hiroshi Yamagami, Masatoshi Koga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of stroke, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Development of tenecteplase for stroke thrombolysis: Japan's endeavor.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Small but Steady Steps in Stroke Medicine in Japan.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kazunori ToyodaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Hiroshi YamagamiDivision of Stroke Care Unit, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Masatoshi KogaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 18ek0210055h0003Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 18ek0210091h0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of direct oral anticoagulants and their antidotes has led to the need to reconsider the eligibility of acute stroke patients who have been taking oral anticoagulants for intravenous thrombolysis. Officially authorized Japanese guidelines on this issue were revised twice at the time of approval for clinical use of direct oral anticoagulants and idarucizumab, a specific reversal agent for dabigatran. A unique recommendation in the latest Japanese clinical guides was that thrombolysis can be recommended if the time of the last dose of direct oral anticoagulants exceeds 4 hours and if commonly available anticoagulation markers are normal or subnormal, i.e., international normalized ratio of prothrombin time <1.7 and activated partial thromboplastin time <1.5 times the baseline value (≤40 seconds only as a guide). These criteria are partly supported by the findings of domestic multicenter and single-center surveys that symptomatic or asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage following thrombolysis was rare under the conditions of the criteria. Even for dabigatran users, stroke thrombolysis can be considered without pretreatment by idarucizumab if patients meet the above criteria. If not, direct mechanical thrombectomy can be considered without pretreatment by idarucizumab or thrombolysis, and use of idarucizumab, followed immediately by thrombolysis, can be considered only when thrombectomy cannot be quickly performed. These clinical guides are practical and to some extent economical, but they have some limitations, including lack of corroborating information from sufficient numbers of relevant cases. The guides will be further modified based on the results of future research.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAtrial fibrillationGuideIdarucizumabStrokeThrombolyic therapy

Identifiers

PMID30309227
PMCPMC6186921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.