Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30308816›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2019

Extended persistence of general and cattle-associated fecal indicators in marine and freshwater environment.

Asja Korajkic, Brian R McMinn, Nicholas J Ashbolt, Mano Sivaganesan, Valerie J Harwood, Orin C Shanks

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Persistence and Decay of Fecal Microbiota in Aquatic Habitats.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Relationships between Microbial Indicators and Pathogens in Recreational Water Settings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Asja KorajkicNational Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: Korajkic.asja@epa.gov.
Brian R McMinnNational Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Nicholas J AshboltUniversity of Alberta, School of Public Health, 3-57D South Academic Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G7, Canada.
Mano SivaganesanNational Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Laboratory, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Valerie J HarwoodUniversity of South Florida, Department of Integrative Biology, 4202 E Fowler Ave SCA 110, Tampa, FL 33620, United States.
Orin C ShanksNational Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Laboratory, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Environmental Protection Agency · USVA Office of Research and Development · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal contamination of recreational waters with cattle manure can pose a risk to public health due to the potential presence of various zoonotic pathogens. Fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) have a long history of use in the assessment of recreational water quality, but FIB quantification provides no information about pollution sources. Microbial source tracking (MST) markers have been developed in response to a need to identify pollution sources, yet factors that influence their decay in ambient waters are often poorly understood. We investigated the influence of water type (freshwater versus marine) and select environmental parameters (indigenous microbiota, ambient sunlight) on the decay of FIB and MST markers originating from cattle manure. Experiments were conducted in situ using a submersible aquatic mesocosm containing dialysis bags filled with a mixture of cattle manure and ambient water. Culturable FIB (E. coli, enterococci) were enumerated by membrane filtration and general fecal indicator bacteria (GenBac3, Entero1a, EC23S857) and MST markers (Rum2Bac, CowM2, CowM3) were estimated by qPCR. Water type was the most significant factor influencing decay (three-way ANOVA, p: 0.006 to <0.001), although the magnitude of the effect differed among microbial targets and over time. The presence of indigenous microbiota and exposure to sunlight were significantly correlated (three-way ANOVA, p: 0.044 to <0.001) with decay of enterococci and CowM2, while E. coli, EC23S857, Rum2Bac, and CowM3 (three-way ANOVA, p: 0.044 < 0.001) were significantly impacted by sunlight or indigenous microbiota. Results indicate extended persistence of both cultivated FIB and genetic markers in marine and freshwater water types. Findings suggest that multiple environmental stressors are important determinants of FIB and MST marker persistence, but their magnitude can vary across indicators. Selective exclusion of natural aquatic microbiota and/or sunlight typically resulted in extended survival, but the effect was minor and limited to select microbial targets.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyAnimalsCattleEnterococcusEnvironmental MonitoringEscherichia coliFecesFresh WaterSeawaterWater PollutantsWater PollutantsCattle manureDecayFecal indicatorsMicrobial source tracking markers

Identifiers

PMID30308816
PMCPMC8982556
OpenAlexW2891795614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.