Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30307930›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2018

Opening options for material transfer.

Linda Kahl, Jennifer Molloy, Nicola Patron, Colette Matthewman, Jim Haseloff, David Grewal, Richard Johnson, Drew Endy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Self-documenting plasmids.Trends in biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Plant engineering: advances, bottlenecks, and promise.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Practical Questions for Securing Nucleic Acid Synthesis.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Chemical Reaction Models in Synthetic Promoter Design in Bacteria.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Linda KahlBioBricks Foundation, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4139-8505
Jennifer MolloyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3477-8462
Nicola PatronEarlham Institute, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8389-1851
Colette MatthewmanJohn Innes Centre, Norwich, UK.
Jim HaseloffDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
David GrewalBioBricks Foundation, San Francisco, California, USA.
Richard JohnsonBioBricks Foundation, San Francisco, California, USA.
Drew EndyBioBricks Foundation, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6952-8098

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L014130/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Technology TransferBiotechnologyHumansInternationalityUnited KingdomUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30307930
PMCPMC6871013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.