ArticleBrain and behavior2018
16p11.2 deletion in patients with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia but without intellectual disability.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia: clinical report of 10 cases from three pedigrees with literature review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Paroxysmal Kinesigenic Dyskinesia Caused by 16p11.2 Microdeletion and Related Clinical Features.Neurology. Genetics · 2022Article
- PRRT2 Mutation and Serum Cytokines in Paroxysmal Kinesigenic Dyskinesia.Current medical science · 2022Article
- Novel and de novo point and large microdeletion mutation in PRRT2-related epilepsy.Brain and behavior · 2020Article
- 16p11.2 deletion in patients with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia but without intellectual disability.Brain and behavior · 2018Article
- Paroxysmal Kinesigenic Dyskinesia Caused by 16p11.2 Microdeletion: A Case Report.Case reports in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMutations of the PRRT2 gene are the most common cause for paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia. However, patients with negative PRRT2 mutations are not rare. The aim of this study is to determine whether copy number variant of PRRT2 gene is another potential pathogenic mechanism in the patients with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia with negative PRRT2 point and frameshift mutations.
methodsWe screened PRRT2 copy number variants using the AccuCopy™ method in 29 patients with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia with negative PRRT2 point and frameshift mutations. Next-generation sequencing was used to determine the chromosomal deletion sites in patients with PRRT2 copy number variants, and to exclude mutations in other known causative genes for paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia.
resultsTwo sporadic patients with negative PRRT2 point and frameshift mutations (6.9%) were identified to have de novo PRRT2 copy number deletions (591 and 832 Kb deletions located in 16p11.2). The two patients presented with pure paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia and paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia and benign infantile convulsions, respectively. They had normal intelligence and neuropsychiatric development, in contrast to those previously reported with 16p11.2 deletions complicated with neuropsychiatric disorders. No correlation between the deletion ranges and phenotypic variations was found.
conclusion16p11.2 deletions play causative roles in paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia, especially for sporadic cases. Our findings extend the phenotype of 16p11.2 deletions to pure paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia. Screening for 16p11.2 deletions should thus be included in genetic evaluations for patients with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.