Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30307717›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2018

16p11.2 deletion in patients with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia but without intellectual disability.

Wen Li, Yifan Wang, Bin Li, Bin Tang, Hui Sun, Jinxing Lai, Na He, Bingmei Li, Heng Meng, Weiping Liao and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia: clinical report of 10 cases from three pedigrees with literature review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wen LiInstitute of Neuroscience, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yifan WangInstitute of Neuroscience, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Bin LiInstitute of Neuroscience, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Bin TangInstitute of Neuroscience, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hui SunInstitute of Neuroscience, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinxing LaiInstitute of Neuroscience, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Na HeInstitute of Neuroscience, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Bingmei LiInstitute of Neuroscience, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Heng MengDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Weiping LiaoInstitute of Neuroscience, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaorong LiuInstitute of Neuroscience, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7769-9564
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMutations of the PRRT2 gene are the most common cause for paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia. However, patients with negative PRRT2 mutations are not rare. The aim of this study is to determine whether copy number variant of PRRT2 gene is another potential pathogenic mechanism in the patients with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia with negative PRRT2 point and frameshift mutations.

methodsWe screened PRRT2 copy number variants using the AccuCopy™ method in 29 patients with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia with negative PRRT2 point and frameshift mutations. Next-generation sequencing was used to determine the chromosomal deletion sites in patients with PRRT2 copy number variants, and to exclude mutations in other known causative genes for paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia.

resultsTwo sporadic patients with negative PRRT2 point and frameshift mutations (6.9%) were identified to have de novo PRRT2 copy number deletions (591 and 832 Kb deletions located in 16p11.2). The two patients presented with pure paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia and paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia and benign infantile convulsions, respectively. They had normal intelligence and neuropsychiatric development, in contrast to those previously reported with 16p11.2 deletions complicated with neuropsychiatric disorders. No correlation between the deletion ranges and phenotypic variations was found.

conclusion16p11.2 deletions play causative roles in paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia, especially for sporadic cases. Our findings extend the phenotype of 16p11.2 deletions to pure paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia. Screening for 16p11.2 deletions should thus be included in genetic evaluations for patients with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionAdolescentCase-Control StudiesDNA Copy Number VariationsDystoniaFemaleFrameshift MutationHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsPedigreePhenotypeYoung AdultMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsPRRT2 protein, human16p11.2 deletioncopy number variantsparoxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesiaPRRT2 gene

Identifiers

PMID30307717
PMCPMC6236233
OpenAlexW2896755897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.