Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30307643›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2018

Evaluation of cell culture-grown Bartonella antigens in immunofluorescent antibody assays for the serological diagnosis of bartonellosis in dogs.

Pradeep Neupane, Barbara C Hegarty, Henry S Marr, Ricardo G Maggi, Adam J Birkenheuer, Edward B Breitschwerdt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  4. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Serological evidence of exposure to Bartonella sp. in dogs with suspected vector-borne diseases, toxoplasmosis and neosporosis.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Using Proteomic Approaches to Unravel the Response ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. SuspectedClinical case reports · 2021
    Article
  10. Comparison of Serological and Molecular Assays forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Exposure of Domestic Cats to Three ZoonoticPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Bartonella rochalimae, a newly recognized pathogen in dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pradeep NeupaneDepartment of Clinical Sciences and the Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Barbara C HegartyDepartment of Clinical Sciences and the Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5179-3720
Henry S MarrDepartment of Clinical Sciences and the Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Ricardo G MaggiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and the Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7428-0138
Adam J BirkenheuerDepartment of Clinical Sciences and the Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2617-2252
Edward B BreitschwerdtDepartment of Clinical Sciences and the Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3506-0279
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation 02287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause of poor sensitivity and questionable specificity of immunofluorescent antibody assays (IFAs), serological diagnosis of Bartonella species infections in dogs remains challenging. Despite limitations, IFA testing is the historical "gold standard" for Bartonella serodiagnosis in animals and humans. Because most diagnostic laboratories test against only 1 or 2 Bartonella spp., testing against a broader panel of Bartonella antigens may enhance diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.

objectiveTo evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of Bartonella IFA using 8 cell culture-grown Bartonella spp. isolates. ANIMALS: Archived serum samples from 34 Bartonella spp. naturally exposed, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive dogs and from 26 PCR-negative and IFA-negative dogs.

methodsBartonella IFA sensitivity and specificity were assessed using cell culture-grown whole cell antigens derived from 3 Bartonella henselae (Bh) strains (Bh Houston 1, Bh San Antonio Type 2, Bh California 1), 3 Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii genotypes (Bvb I, II, and III), Bartonella koehlerae (Bk), and Bartonella quintana (Bq).

resultsOnly 62% of 34 Bartonella spp. PCR-positive dogs were seroreactive to any of the 8 Bartonella IFA antigens, indicating low IFA sensitivity. PCR-positive dogs were most often IFA seroreactive to Bq (n = 15), to Bvb II (n = 13), or to both (n = 9) antigens. Of the 26 previously IFA-negative/PCR-negative dogs, 4 (15%) were seroreactive using the expanded antigen panel. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Despite IFA testing of dogs against 8 different Bartonella isolates, IFA sensitivity remained poor, and specificity was only 85%. Development of a reliable serological assay is needed to facilitate the diagnosis of Bartonella infection in dogs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, BacterialBartonellaBartonella henselaeBartonella InfectionsBartonella quintanaCells, CulturedDog DiseasesDogsFluorescent Antibody TechniquePolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsTrench FeverAntigens, BacterialbacteriaBAPGMserologyvector-bornezoonosis

Identifiers

PMID30307643
PMCPMC6271329
OpenAlexW2897360561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.