Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30307533›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2019

The Burden of Frailty Among U.S. Veterans and Its Association With Mortality, 2002-2012.

Ariela R Orkaby, Lisa Nussbaum, Yuk-Lam Ho, David Gagnon, Lien Quach, Rachel Ward, Rachel Quaden, Enzo Yaksic, Kelly Harrington, Julie M Paik and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. How does Frailty Impact Peri-Operative and Speech Recognition Outcomes for Cochlear Implants in Veterans?Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  20. Evaluating Frailty Index Integrity: Insights from an International Network Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ariela R OrkabyNew England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts.
Lisa NussbaumMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.
Yuk-Lam HoMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.
David GagnonMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.
Lien QuachMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.
Rachel WardMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.
Rachel QuadenMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.
Enzo YaksicMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.
Kelly HarringtonMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.
Julie M PaikNew England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts.
Dae H KimDivision of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Peter W WilsonMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.
J Michael GazianoMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.
Luc DjousseMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.
Kelly ChoMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), Boston, Massachusetts.
Jane A DriverNew England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts.

Funding

Development and Validation of a Frailty Index Using Claims Data for Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies in Older AdultsK08AG051187 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KIM, DAE HYUN · 2015 to 2017
$636k
Prediction of CVD Risk in VeteransI01CX001025 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI CHO, KELLY, WILSON, PETER WYMAN · 2014 to 2025
–
CSRD VA I01 CX001025NIA NIH HHS K08 AG051187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrailty is a key determinant of clinical outcomes. We sought to describe frailty among U.S. Veterans and its association with mortality.

methodsNationwide retrospective cohort study of regular Veterans Affairs (VA) users, aged at least 65 years in 2002-2012, followed through 2014, using national VA administrative and Medicare and Medicaid data. A frailty index (FI) for VA (VA-FI) was calculated using the cumulative deficit method. Thirty-one age-related deficits in health from diagnostic and procedure codes were included and were updated biennially. Survival analysis assessed associations between VA-FI and mortality.

resultsA VA-FI was calculated for 2,837,152 Veterans over 10 years. In 2002, 35.5% were non-frail (FI = 0-0.10), 32.6% were pre-frail (FI = 0.11-0.20), 18.9% were mildly frail (FI = 0.21-0.30), 8.7% were moderately frail (FI = 0.31-0.40), and 4.3% were severely frail (FI > 0.40). From 2002 to 2012, the prevalence of moderate frailty increased to 12.7%and severe frailty to 14.1%. Frailty was strongly associated with survival and was independent of age, sex, race, and smoking; the VA-FI better predicted mortality than age alone. Although prevalence of frailty rose over time, compared to non-frail Veterans, 2 years' hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for mortality declined from a peak in 2004 of 2.01 (1.97-2.04), 3.49 (3.44-3.55), 5.88 (5.79-5.97), and 10.39 (10.23-10.56) for pre-frail, mildly, moderately, and severely frail, respectively, to 1.51 (1.49-1.53), 2.36 (2.33-2.39), 3.68 (3.63-3.73), 6.62 (6.53-6.71) in 2012. At every frailty level, risk of mortality was lower for women versus men and higher for blacks versus whites.

conclusionsFrailty affects at least 3 of every 10 U.S. Veterans aged 65 years and older, and is strongly associated with mortality. The VA-FI could be used to more accurately estimate life expectancy and individualize care for Veterans.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyVeteransAgedFemaleFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesEpidemiologyFrailtyMortality

Identifiers

PMID30307533
PMCPMC6625596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.