Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30307320›Full record

ArticleBreastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine2018

Sources of Information and Support for Breastfeeding: Alignment with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Strategies.

Carolyn Sutter, Barbara H Fiese, Alexandra Lundquist, Erin C Davis, Brent A McBride, Sharon M Donovan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03341858 (STRONG Kids 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03341858 active not recruitingnot on this map

STRONG Kids 2: A Cells-to-Society Approach to Nutrition in Early Childhood

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignRan2013 to 2029Enrolled450ConditionsChild Obesity, Child, OnlyArmsno intervention-strictly observational
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolyn Sutter1 Family Resiliency Center, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Barbara H Fiese1 Family Resiliency Center, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Alexandra Lundquist2 Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Erin C Davis2 Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Brent A McBride1 Family Resiliency Center, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Sharon M Donovan1 Family Resiliency Center, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesResearch consistently supports health benefits of breastfeeding; however, rates in the United States remain below Healthy People 2020 goals. To increase breastfeeding, information and support are needed from multiple sources. Given differences in breastfeeding rates by demographic characteristics, sources of information and support may also differ. In addition, recent research suggests potential differences in health outcomes related to feeding method (direct breastfeeding only, feeding expressed human milk, combination-feeding with formula). This study examined (1) information and support received within Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-defined strategies for supporting breastfeeding mothers, (2) differences in rates of information and support received by demographics, and (3) associations with feeding method at 6 weeks postpartum. MATERIALS AND

methodsA sample of 447 women participating in the Synergistic Theory Research Obesity and Nutrition Group (STRONG) Kids 2 study completed surveys with questions from the CDC Survey on Infant Feeding Practices II related to sources of information and support for breastfeeding and breast pump use, and about demographics and feeding method at 6 weeks postpartum.

resultsFrequencies of supports received within each category indicate that professional supports were the most pervasive, followed by support from friends and relatives. However, women at greater risk for breastfeeding cessation (lower education, Women, Infants, and Children participants, single mothers) received information and support at lower rates. Education and information support was the only source significantly associated with feeding method.

conclusionNew approaches are needed to increase efficacy of information delivery, especially for at-risk populations, to better meet CDC recommendations.

Indexed as

AdultBreast FeedingCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.FemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMothersPostpartum PeriodSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adultbreastfeedinginformationsupport

Identifiers

PMID30307320
PMCPMC6247975
OpenAlexW2897502867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.