Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30307063›Full record

ArticleClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2019

An evidence-based approach to learning clinical anatomy: A guide for medical students, educators, and administrators.

Anthony V D'Antoni, Estomih P Mtui, Marios Loukas, R Shane Tubbs, Genevieve Pinto Zipp, John Dunlosky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Simplified Abdominal Wall Model to Teach Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anthony V D'AntoniDivision of Anatomy, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9743-8935
Estomih P MtuiDivision of Anatomy, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Marios LoukasDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University School of Medicine, Grenada, West Indies.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2811-6657
R Shane TubbsSeattle Science Foundation, Seattle, Washington.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1317-1047
Genevieve Pinto ZippDepartment of Interprofessional Health Sciences and Health Administration, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Seton Hall University, South Orange, New Jersey.
John DunloskyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amount of information that medical students learn is voluminous and those who do not use evidence-based learning strategies may struggle. Research from cognitive and educational psychology provides a blueprint on how best to learn science subjects, including clinical anatomy. Students should aim for high-cognitive learning levels as defined in the SOLO taxonomy. Using a real-world example from a modern clinical anatomy textbook, we describe how to learn information using strategies that have been experimentally validated as effective. Students should avoid highlighting and rereading text because they do not result in robust learning as defined in the SOLO taxonomy. We recommend that students use (1) practice testing, (2) distributed practice, and (3) successive relearning. Practice testing refers to nonsummative assessments that contain questions used to facilitate retrieval (e.g., flashcards and practice questions). Practice questions can be fill-in, short-answer, and multiple-choice types, and students should receive explanatory feedback. Distributed practice, the technique of distributing learning of the same content within a single study session or across sessions, has been found to facilitate long-term retention. Finally, successive relearning combines both practice testing and distributed practice. For this strategy, students use practice questions to continue learning until they can answer all of the practice questions correctly. Students who continuously use practice testing, distributed practice, and successive relearning will become more efficient and effective learners. Our hope is that the real-world clinical anatomy example presented in this article makes it easier for students to implement these evidence-based strategies and ultimately improve their learning. Clin. Anat., 2018. © 2018 The Authors. Clinical Anatomy published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Clinical Anatomists.

Indexed as

LearningAnatomyEvidence-Based PracticeHumansclinical anatomycognitive psychologydistributed practiceeducational psychologyhighlightinglearning strategiespractice testingrereadingSOLO taxonomysuccessive relearning

Identifiers

PMID30307063
PMCPMC7379743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.