Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30306718›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2019

Revisiting the methionine salvage pathway and its paralogues.

Agnieszka Sekowska, Hiroki Ashida, Antoine Danchin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Targeting macro- and micro-nutrient regulation of HNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  9. An3 Biotech · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The metabolomics of a protein kinase C delta (PKCδ) knock-out mouse model.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Agnieszka SekowskaInstitute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Hiroki AshidaGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Antoine DanchinInstitute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Fondation pour l’innovation en Cadiométabolisme et Nutrition · FRKobe University · JPPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methionine is essential for life. Its chemistry makes it fragile in the presence of oxygen. Aerobic living organisms have selected a salvage pathway (the MSP) that uses dioxygen to regenerate methionine, associated to a ratchet-like step that prevents methionine back degradation. Here, we describe the variation on this theme, developed across the tree of life. Oxygen appeared long after life had developed on Earth. The canonical MSP evolved from ancestors that used both predecessors of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase (RuBisCO) and methanethiol in intermediate steps. We document how these likely promiscuous pathways were also used to metabolize the omnipresent by-products of S-adenosylmethionine radical enzymes as well as the aromatic and isoprene skeleton of quinone electron acceptors.

Indexed as

AerobiosisMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMethionineOxidation-ReductionOxygenQuinonesMethionineOxygenQuinones

Identifiers

PMID30306718
PMCPMC6302742
OpenAlexW2895850079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.