Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30306530›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2018

The role of small-angle scattering in structure-based screening applications.

Po-Chia Chen, Janosch Hennig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Target Engagement Assays in Early Drug Discovery.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Po-Chia ChenStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory Heidelberg, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany. pchen@embl.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2272-2082
Janosch HennigStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory Heidelberg, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany. janosch.hennig@embl.de.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SPP1935H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions MSCACOFUND-FP #664726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many biomolecular interactions, changes in the assembly states and structural conformations of participants can act as a complementary reporter of binding to functional and thermodynamic assays. This structural information is captured by a number of structural biology and biophysical techniques that are viable either as primary screens in small-scale applications or as secondary screens to complement higher throughput methods. In particular, small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) reports the average distance distribution between all atoms after orientational averaging. Such information is important when for example investigating conformational changes involved in inhibitory and regulatory mechanisms where binding events do not necessarily cause functional changes. Thus, we summarise here the current and prospective capabilities of SAXS-based screening in the context of other methods that yield structural information. Broad guidelines are also provided to assist readers in preparing screening protocols that are tailored to available X-ray sources.

Indexed as

ScreeningSmall-angle scatteringStructural biology

Identifiers

PMID30306530
PMCPMC6233350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.