ArticleRadiological physics and technology2018
Effectiveness of a novel real-time dosimeter in interventional radiology: a comparison of new and old radiation sensors.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a headgear-based eye protection device for physicians performing fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy.Journal of radiation research · 2025Article
- Real time eye dose reduction in fluoroscopy with auditory and visual feedback dosimeter through swine model experiments.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Eye Lens Radiation Dose to Nurses during Cardiac Interventional Radiology: An Initial Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Spatial Scattering Radiation to the Radiological Technologist during Medical Mobile Radiography.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of radiation dose for inferior vena cava filter placement during pregnancy: A comparison of dosimetry and dose calculation software.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Evaluation of a New Real-Time Dosimeter Sensor for Interventional Radiology Staff.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Development of a New Radiation Shield for the Face and Neck of IVR Physicians.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?Radiological physics and technology · 2022Review
- Lens dose reduction with a bismuth shield in neuro cone-beam computed tomography: an investigation on optimum shield device placement conditions.Radiological physics and technology · 2022Article
- Occupational eye dose correlation with neck dose and patient-related quantities in interventional cardiology procedures.Radiological physics and technology · 2022Article
- Radiation Eye Dose for Physicians in CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Biopsy.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Article
- Non-Lead Protective Aprons for the Protection of Interventional Radiology Physicians from Radiation Exposure in Clinical Settings: An Initial Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Fetal radiation dose of four tube voltages in abdominal CT examinations during pregnancy: A phantom study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Hybrid Operating Room System for the Treatment of Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Evaluation of the Radiation Dose Received by Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Reducing the Breast Cancer Risk and Radiation Dose of Radiography for Scoliosis in Children: A Phantom Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- An initial investigation of a wireless patient radiation dosimeter for use in interventional radiology.Radiological physics and technology · 2020Article
- Development of Novel Real-Time Radiation Systems Using 4-Channel Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Radiation dose management is important in interventional radiology (IR) procedures, such as percutaneous coronary intervention, to prevent radiation-induced injuries. Therefore, radiation dose should be monitored in real time during IR. This study evaluated the fundamental characteristics of a novel real-time skin dosimeter (RTSD) developed at our institution. In addition, we compared the performance of our new and old radiation sensors and that of a skin dose monitor (SDM), with ion chamber reference values. We evaluated the fundamental characteristics (e.g., energy dependence, dose dependence, and angular dependence) of the RTSD developed by us in the diagnostic X-ray energy range. The performance of our RTSD was similar to that of the SDM. In particular, the new radiation sensor of our RTSD demonstrated better dose rate dependence compared to the old sensor. In addition, the new sensor had the advantage of being small in size and thus minimally affecting the X-ray images compared to the old sensor. Therefore, the developed skin dosimeter and radiation sensor may be useful in real-time measurement of patients' exposure to and multi-channel monitoring of radiation in IR procedures. The new dosimeter system can be recommended for visualization and management of the radiation dose to which the patients' skin is exposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.