Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30306454›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2018

Factors influencing the recruitment of lactating women in a clinical trial involving direct oral anticoagulants: a qualitative study.

Yating Zhao, Amally Ding, Roopen Arya, Jignesh P Patel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pregnancy-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Insights from GARFIELD-VTE.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yating ZhaoInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, 5th Floor Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK. yating.zhao@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8215-1683
Amally DingInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, 5th Floor Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK.
Roopen AryaKing's Thrombosis Centre, Department of Haematological Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jignesh P PatelInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, 5th Floor Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK.
King's College London · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Robust human data on medication use during lactation is scarce. With increasing medication use in postpartum women, it is important to conduct clinical lactation studies measuring the excretion of drugs in human milk and generate evidence. We plan to conduct a clinical lactation study, involving the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Objective This study aimed to identify factors influencing lactating women's clinical trial participation and to improve the design of a proposed DOACs clinical lactation study. Setting Lactating women in London, UK. Methods Three focus groups were conducted in lactating women with differing experiences of being prescribed anticoagulants during puerperium. Main outcome measures Thematic framework approach was used to analyse and identify key themes, using NVivo version 11. Results Eight breastfeeding mothers participated. Women's decision-making on clinical trial participation was largely influenced by the lactation stage and previous breastfeeding experience. The concern of harm to their infant caused by the test medication or interruption of lactation were the predominant barriers to potential participation. Around 6 months following the birth of their infant and second-time mothers appeared to be more amenable to clinical trial participation. The provision of home visits for the execution of the study was highly recommended. Conclusion Our findings suggest that lactating women would participate in a clinical trial during the breastfeeding period, if the timing is right and if the woman is an experienced mother. Home visits will be provided in our proposed DOACs clinical lactation study.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsClinical Trials as TopicLactationPatient SelectionAdultBreast FeedingDecision MakingFemaleHouse CallsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLondonMiddle AgedMotivationParityAnticoagulantsAnticoagulationBreastfeedingClinical trialsDirect oral anticoagulantsThrombosisVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID30306454
PMCPMC6280865
OpenAlexW2895997821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.