Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30306452›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019

Importance of Resection Margins in the Treatment of Rectal Adenomas by Transanal Endoscopic Surgery.

Xavier Serra-Aracil, Neus Ruiz-Edo, Alex Casalots-Casado, Laura Mora-López, Anna Pallisera-Lloveras, Sheila Serra-Pla, Vanlentí Puig-Diví, Salvador Navarro-Soto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xavier Serra-AracilDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Parc Taulí University Hospital, Sabadell, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Parc Taulí Street s/n, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Neus Ruiz-EdoDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Parc Taulí University Hospital, Sabadell, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Parc Taulí Street s/n, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain. mnruiz@tauli.cat.ORCID 0000-0003-0925-0244
Alex Casalots-CasadoDepartment of Pathology, Parc Taulí University Hospital, Sabadell, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Parc Taulí Street s/n, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura Mora-LópezDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Parc Taulí University Hospital, Sabadell, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Parc Taulí Street s/n, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna Pallisera-LloverasDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Parc Taulí University Hospital, Sabadell, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Parc Taulí Street s/n, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Sheila Serra-PlaDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Parc Taulí University Hospital, Sabadell, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Parc Taulí Street s/n, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Vanlentí Puig-DivíDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Parc Taulí University Hospital, Sabadell, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Parc Taulí Street s/n, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Salvador Navarro-SotoDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Parc Taulí University Hospital, Sabadell, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Parc Taulí Street s/n, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolypectomy is the gold standard for treating colorectal adenomas up to 2 cm in size. For larger lesions, various procedures ranging from endoscopy to transanal surgery can be performed and achieve varying results for en bloc resection and recurrence. There are no clear guidelines for dealing with involved resection margins. We assess the recurrence of rectal adenomas operated using TEM with full-thickness wall excision with or without free resection margins and define optimal endoscopic follow-up.

methodObservational study with prospective data collection, including patients undergoing TEM between 6/2004 and 11/2017, with definitive diagnosis of rectal adenoma. Data on epidemiological, preoperative, surgical, postoperative, pathological, and follow-up variables were recorded. Univariate analysis, follow-up risk function, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to detect risk factors for recurrence.

resultsTEM was indicated in 736 patients; 481 adenomas were identified in the preoperative biopsy, of which 95 were infiltrating adenocarcinomas (19.8%) in the definitive pathology study. With a minimum follow-up of 1 year, 372 patients were included. Pathology study showed free margins in 324 (87%). Recurrences were recorded in 15 patients (4%), up to 18 months in the free margins group and up to 24 months in the involved margins group. Thirteen patients with recurrence (86.6%) were treated with TEM. No predictors of recurrence were found in the multivariate analysis.

conclusionTEM is the technique of choice for treating rectal adenomas and recurrences, achieving a low relapse rate. Follow-up must be adapted to resection margins and should be extended to 24 months.

Indexed as

Margins of ExcisionAdenomaAdultAgedBiopsyFemaleHumansMaleMicrosurgeryMiddle AgedProctectomyProspective StudiesRectal NeoplasmsRisk FactorsTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryFollow-up rectal adenomasRectal adenomasRecurrence rectal adenomasTEM

Identifiers

PMID30306452
OpenAlexW2896779174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.