ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019
Importance of Resection Margins in the Treatment of Rectal Adenomas by Transanal Endoscopic Surgery.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of pT1N0M0 rectal cancer: the central role of pathology in therapeutic decisions.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Interobserver agreement of the Taulí-pT1 classification in rectal pT1 adenocarcinoma.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Observational
- Local Recurrence of Premalignant and Early Malignant Rectal Polyps Treated by TEM-A Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for the treatment of rectal lesions involving the dentate line.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Complex Procedures in Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery: Intraperitoneal Entry, Ultra Large Rectal Tumors, High Lesions, and Resection in the Anal Canal.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022Review
- Prognosis of Patients Over 60 Years Old With Early Rectal Cancer Undergoing Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery - A Single-Center Experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Can Ultrasound Elastography Discriminate between Rectal Adenoma and Cancer? A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2021Review
- Article
- Predictors of rectal adenoma recurrence following transanal endoscopic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Is Local Resection of Anal Canal Tumors Feasible with Transanal Endoscopic Surgery?World journal of surgery · 2020Observational
- Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in very large and ultra large rectal neoplasia.Techniques in coloproctology · 2019Observational
- Analysis of the therapeutic effect of transanal endoscopic microsurgery on large rectal adenoma.Journal of minimal access surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPolypectomy is the gold standard for treating colorectal adenomas up to 2 cm in size. For larger lesions, various procedures ranging from endoscopy to transanal surgery can be performed and achieve varying results for en bloc resection and recurrence. There are no clear guidelines for dealing with involved resection margins. We assess the recurrence of rectal adenomas operated using TEM with full-thickness wall excision with or without free resection margins and define optimal endoscopic follow-up.
methodObservational study with prospective data collection, including patients undergoing TEM between 6/2004 and 11/2017, with definitive diagnosis of rectal adenoma. Data on epidemiological, preoperative, surgical, postoperative, pathological, and follow-up variables were recorded. Univariate analysis, follow-up risk function, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to detect risk factors for recurrence.
resultsTEM was indicated in 736 patients; 481 adenomas were identified in the preoperative biopsy, of which 95 were infiltrating adenocarcinomas (19.8%) in the definitive pathology study. With a minimum follow-up of 1 year, 372 patients were included. Pathology study showed free margins in 324 (87%). Recurrences were recorded in 15 patients (4%), up to 18 months in the free margins group and up to 24 months in the involved margins group. Thirteen patients with recurrence (86.6%) were treated with TEM. No predictors of recurrence were found in the multivariate analysis.
conclusionTEM is the technique of choice for treating rectal adenomas and recurrences, achieving a low relapse rate. Follow-up must be adapted to resection margins and should be extended to 24 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.