Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30306398›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2019

Systematic literature review on the delays in the diagnosis and misdiagnosis of cluster headache.

Alina Buture, Fayyaz Ahmed, Lisa Dikomitis, Jason W Boland

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Delayed diagnosis of cluster headache in Portugal.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Cluster Headache: A Clinical Practice Guideline.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Review
  9. Hallmarks of primary headache: part 3 - cluster headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cluster headache: state of the art in treatment.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Cluster headache in adults.Australian prescriber · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Perceptions, experiences, and understandings of cluster headache among GPs and neurologists: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alina ButureDepartment of Neurology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK. Alina.buture@hey.nhs.uk.
Fayyaz AhmedDepartment of Neurology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.
Lisa DikomitisSchool of Medicine and Research Institute Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Jason W BolandHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
University of Hull · GBHull Royal Infirmary · GBKeele University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with cluster headache (CH), the most common trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia, often face delayed diagnosis, misdiagnosis and mismanagement.

objectivesTo identify, appraise and synthesise clinical studies on the delays in diagnosis and misdiagnosis of CH in order to determine its causes and help the management of this condition.

methodsThe systematic review was prepared, conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. It was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. A systematic search of different electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, BNI, HMIC, AMED, HBE and Cochrane Library) was carried out in May 2017. Reference lists of relevant articles were hand searched.

resultsThe search identified 201 unique studies. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria of which 13 case series studies and two survey studies. Nine studies assessed the delays in diagnosis and misdiagnosis of CH, five studies the delays in diagnosis and one study the misdiagnosis of CH. The studies included 4661 patients. Delays in diagnosis, misdiagnosis and mismanagement have been reported in many European countries, Japan and in the USA with well-developed health services. The patients with CH often visited many different clinicians, surgeons and dentists and received multiple diagnosis prior to being correctly diagnosed.

conclusionThis systematic review shows that the delays in the diagnosis of CH are a widespread problem, the time to diagnosis still vary from country to country and both patients and physicians are responsible for the delays in diagnosis.

Indexed as

Cluster HeadacheDelayed DiagnosisDiagnostic ErrorsHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesDiagnostic errorDiagnostic mistakeMismanagementTherapeutic errorUnrecognised diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID30306398
PMCPMC6329709
OpenAlexW2896562578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.