ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2019
Comparison of CHA
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A critical review and classification of dementia risk assessment tools to inform dementia risk reduction.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Pooled it
- Disease-Specific Risk Models for Predicting Dementia: An Umbrella Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Clinical outcomes in heart failure patients with and without atrial fibrillation receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2023Article
- Stratifying risk for dementia onset using large-scale electronic health record data: A retrospective cohort study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2020Article
- Comparison of incidence of acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease between atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: real-world evidences from a propensity score-matched national cohort analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2019Article
- What's New in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling? An Updated Systematic Review.Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extraReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the use of the CHA
Indexed as
Identifiers
30306322What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.