Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30306284›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of headache and pain2018

Oxygen treatment for cluster headache attacks at different flow rates: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.

Thijs H T Dirkx, Danielle Y P Haane, Peter J Koehler

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of headache and pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 15. Cluster Headache.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cluster headache: state of the art in treatment.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Oxygen Therapy in Cluster Headache, Migraine, and Other Headache Disorders.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thijs H T DirkxDepartment of Neurology, Zuyderland Medical Center Heerlen, PO Box 4446, 6401, CX, Heerlen, The Netherlands. thijsdirkx@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1227-4570
Danielle Y P HaaneDepartment of Neurology, Zuyderland Medical Center Heerlen, PO Box 4446, 6401, CX, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Peter J KoehlerDepartment of Neurology, Zuyderland Medical Center Heerlen, PO Box 4446, 6401, CX, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Zuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCluster headache attacks can, in many patients, be successfully treated with oxygen via a non-rebreather mask. In previous studies oxygen at flow rates of both 7 L/min and 12 L/min was shown to be effective. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of 100% oxygen at different flow rates for the treatment of cluster headache attacks.

methodsIn a double-blind, randomized, crossover study, oxygen naïve cluster headache patients, treated attacks with oxygen at 7 and 12 L/min. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of attacks after which patients (treating at least 2 attacks/day) were painfree after 15 min, in the first two days of the study. Secondary outcome measures were percentage of successfully treated attacks, percentage of attacks after which patients were painfree, drop in VAS score and patient preference in all treatment periods (14 days).

resultsNinety-eight patients were enrolled, 70 provided valid data, 56 used both flow rates. These 56 patients recorded 604 attacks, eligible for the primary analysis. An exploratory analysis was conducted using all eligible attacks of 70 patients who provided valid data. We could only include 5 patients, treating 27 attacks on the first two days of the study, for our primary outcome, which did not show a significant difference (p = 0.180). Patients tended to prefer 12 L/min (p = 0.005). Contradicting this result, more patients were painfree using 7 L/min (p = 0.039). There were no differences in side effects or in our other secondary outcome measures. The exploratory analysis showed an odds ratio of being painfree using 12 L/min of 0.73 (95% CI 0.52-1.02) compared to 7 L/min (p = 0.061) as scored on a 5-point scale. The average drop in score on this 5-point scale, however, was equal between groups. Also slightly more patients noticed, no or not much, relief on 7 L/min, and found 12 L/min to be effective in all their attacks.

conclusionThere is lack of evidence to support differences in the effect of oxygen at a flow rate of 12 L/min compared to 7 L/min. More patients were painfree using 7 L/min, but our other outcome measures did not confirm a difference in effect between flow rates. As most patients prefer 12 L/min and treatments were equally safe, this could be used in all patients. It might be more cost-effective, however, to start with 7 L/min and, if ineffective, to switch to 12 L/min.

trial registrationEuropean Union Clinical Trials Register ( 2012-003648-59 ), registered 1 October 2012. Dutch Trial Register ( NTR3801 ), registered 14 January 2013.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCluster HeadacheCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygenTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultOxygenAcute treatmentCluster headacheOxygenRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID30306284
PMCPMC6755552
OpenAlexW2897119576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.