Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30306280›Full record

ArticleRice (New York, N.Y.)2018

A northern Chinese origin of Austronesian agriculture: new evidence on traditional Formosan cereals.

Laurent Sagart, Tze-Fu Hsu, Yuan-Ching Tsai, Cheng-Chieh Wu, Lin-Tzu Huang, Yu-Chi Chen, Yi-Fang Chen, Yu-Chien Tseng, Hung-Ying Lin, Yue-Ie Caroline Hsing

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rice (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Laurent SagartCentre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l'Asie Orientale/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, INaLCO, 2 rue de Lille, 75007, Paris, France.
Tze-Fu HsuInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan.
Yuan-Ching TsaiDepartment of Agronomy, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, 600, Taiwan.
Cheng-Chieh WuInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan.
Lin-Tzu HuangInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan.
Yu-Chi ChenTaiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund, Taipei, 111, Taiwan.
Yi-Fang ChenSoil and Water Conservation Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Nantou, 540, Taiwan.
Yu-Chien TsengDepartment of Agronomy, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, 600, Taiwan.
Hung-Ying LinDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011-1085, USA.
Yue-Ie Caroline HsingInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan. bohsing@gate.sinica.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2900-7068
Council of Agriculture · TWInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica · TWNational Chiayi University · TWNational Taiwan University · TWCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRIowa State University · US

Funding

Academia Sinica Investigator Award and Summit ProjectCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique Research Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic data for traditional Taiwanese (Formosan) agriculture is essential for tracing the origins on the East Asian mainland of the Austronesian language family, whose homeland is generally placed in Taiwan. Three main models for the origins of the Taiwanese Neolithic have been proposed: origins in coastal north China (Shandong); in coastal central China (Yangtze Valley), and in coastal south China. A combination of linguistic and agricultural evidence helps resolve this controversial issue.

resultsWe report on botanically informed linguistic fieldwork of the agricultural vocabulary of Formosan aborigines, which converges with earlier findings in archaeology, genetics and historical linguistics to assign a lesser role for rice than was earlier thought, and a more important one for the millets. We next present the results of an investigation of domestication genes in a collection of traditional rice landraces maintained by the Formosan aborigines over a hundred years ago. The genes controlling awn length, shattering, caryopsis color, plant and panicle shapes contain the same mutated sequences as modern rice varieties everywhere else in the world, arguing against an independent domestication in south China or Taiwan. Early and traditional Formosan agriculture was based on foxtail millet, broomcorn millet and rice. We trace this suite of cereals to northeastern China in the period 6000-5000 BCE and argue, following earlier proposals, that the precursors of the Austronesians, expanded south along the coast from Shandong after c. 5000 BCE to reach northwest Taiwan in the second half of the 4th millennium BCE. This expansion introduced to Taiwan a mixed farming, fishing and intertidal foraging subsistence strategy; domesticated foxtail millet, broomcorn millet and japonica rice; a belief in the sacredness of foxtail millet; ritual ablation of the upper incisors in adolescents of both sexes; domesticated dogs; and a technological package including inter alia houses, nautical technology, and loom weaving.

conclusionWe suggest that the pre-Austronesians expanded south along the coast from that region after c. 5000 BCE to reach northwest Taiwan in the second half of the 4th millennium BCE.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyAustronesian languageDomestication genesMilletRiceRice landracesTaiwan Neolithic origins

Identifiers

PMID30306280
PMCPMC6179969
OpenAlexW2897960406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.