Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30306254›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2018

Patterns of the initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in incident rheumatoid arthritis: a German perspective based on nationwide ambulatory drug prescription data.

Annika Steffen, Jakob Holstiege, Kerstin Klimke, Manas K Akmatov, Jörg Bätzing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Treatment Patterns and Pharmacoutilization in Patients Affected by Rheumatoid Arthritis in Italian Settings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Influence of Age and Sex on Disease Course and Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annika SteffenCentral Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany (Zi), Salzufer 8, 10587, Berlin, Germany. asteffen@zi.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4072-9245
Jakob HolstiegeCentral Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany (Zi), Salzufer 8, 10587, Berlin, Germany.
Kerstin KlimkeCentral Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany (Zi), Salzufer 8, 10587, Berlin, Germany.
Manas K AkmatovCentral Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany (Zi), Salzufer 8, 10587, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2310-3179
Jörg BätzingCentral Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany (Zi), Salzufer 8, 10587, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed at providing a current and nearly complete picture of the patterns of the initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with newly diagnosed RA. Based on ambulatory drug prescription data and physician billing claims data covering 87% of the German population, we assembled a cohort of incident RA patients aged 15-79 years (n = 54,896) and assessed the prescription frequency of total DMARDs, conventional synthetic (csDMARDs) and biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) within the first year of disease. Using multiple logistic regression, we estimated the chance of early DMARD receipt based on age, sex, serotype and specialty of prescribing physician while controlling for region of residence. In total, 44% of incident RA patients received a DMARD prescription within the first year of disease. In multiple regression, younger patients (< 35 years) had 1.7-fold higher chances of receiving a csDMARD than patients aged ≥ 65 years [odds ratio (OR): 1.65 with 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51-1.80] and almost tenfold higher chances to receive a bDMARD [OR (95% CI) 9.5 (8.0-11.3)]. Seropositivity and a visit to a rheumatologist were positively associated with DMARD initiation [OR (95% CI) 2.8 (2.6-2.9) and 5.9 (5.6-6.2) for csDMARDs, respectively]. Based on data covering 87% of the German population, the present study revealed that less than half of incident RA patients receive DMARDs within the first year of disease and that marked differences exist according to age. The study highlights the importance of involving a rheumatologist early in the management of RA.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAmbulatory CareAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidClinical Decision-MakingDrug PrescriptionsFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Antirheumatic AgentsAmbulatory drug prescription dataBiologicalsDisease-modifying antirheumatic drugsGlucocorticoidsNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugsRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID30306254
PMCPMC6208685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.