Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30306242›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Asymmetric polyethylene inserts promote favorable kinematics and better clinical outcome compared to symmetric inserts in a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Gianluca Castellarin, Silvia Pianigiani, Bernardo Innocenti

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. High congruency MB insert design: stabilizing knee joint even with PCL deficiency.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gianluca CastellarinII Unit Orthopaedic Department, Ospedale di Suzzara, Mantua, Italy.
Silvia PianigianiBEAMS Department, École polytechnique de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av F. Roosevelt 50, Brussels, 1050, Belgium.
Bernardo InnocentiBEAMS Department, École polytechnique de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av F. Roosevelt 50, Brussels, 1050, Belgium. bernardo.innocenti@ulb.ac.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8992-8865
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique-FNRS CDR 19545501Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique-FNRS CDR 29155446Université Libre de Bruxelles FER 2014Université Libre de Bruxelles FER 2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims at comparing the effects of symmetric and asymmetric designs for the polyethylene insert currently available and also for mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The investigation was performed both clinically and biomechanically through finite element analysis.

methods303 patients, with a mobile bearing TKA, were analyzed retrospectively. All patients received the same femoral and tibial components; for the insert, 151 patients received a symmetric design (SD) and 152 an asymmetric design (AD). Additionally, a 3D finite element model of a lower leg was developed, resurfaced with the same TKAs and analysed during gait and squat activities. TKA kinematics, and bone-stresses were investigated for the two insert solutions.

resultsAfter surgery, patients' average flexion improved from 105°, with 5° of preoperative extension deficit, to 120° (AD-group) and 115° (SD-group) at the latest follow-up. There was no postoperative extension deficit. No pain affected the AD-group, while an antero-lateral pain was reported in some patients of the SD-group. Patients of the AD-group presented a better ability to perform certain physical routines. Biomechanically, the SD induced higher tibial-bone stresses than the AD. Both designs replicated similar kinematics, comparable to literature. However, SD rotates more on the tray, reducing the motion between femoral and polyethylene components, while AD permits greater insert rotation.

conclusionThe biomechanical analysis justifies the clinical findings. TKA kinematics is similar for the two designs, although the asymmetric solution shows less bone stress, thus resulting as more suitable to be cemented, avoiding lift-off issues, inducing less pain. Clinically, and biomechanically, an asymmetric mobile bearing insert could be a valid alternative to symmetric mobile bearing insert. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study retrospective comparative study, III.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisProsthesis DesignAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBiomechanical PhenomenaCase-Control StudiesFemaleFemurFinite Element AnalysisGaitHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalKnee JointLegMalePolyethyleneAsymmetric insertBiomechanicsInsert congruencyKinematicsMobile bearingSymmetric insertTKA

Identifiers

PMID30306242
OpenAlexW2897359993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.