Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30306215›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2019

[Costs and proceeds from patients admitted via the emergency room with mild craniocerebral trauma].

René Verboket, Christina Verboket, Oliver Schöffski, Johanna Tlatlik, Ingo Marzi, Christoph Nau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Seizure related injuries - Frequent injury patterns, hospitalization and therapeutic aspects.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2022
    Article
  6. Combined trauma in craniomaxillofacial and orthopedic-traumatological patients: the need for proper interdisciplinary care in trauma units.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Cost-proceeds deficit of outpatient treatment of head lacerations in the emergency department].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

René VerboketKlinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Uniklinik Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland. Rene.Verboket@kgu.de.
Christina Verboket
Oliver SchöffskiLehrstuhl für Gesundheitsmanagement, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
Johanna TlatlikKlinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Uniklinik Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
Ingo MarziKlinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Uniklinik Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
Christoph NauKlinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Uniklinik Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) in 2003 radically changed the billing of the treatment costs. From the very beginning, trauma surgeons questioned whether the introduction of the DRG could have a negative impact on the care of the severely injured. "Trauma centers in need" was the big catchword warning against shortfalls at trauma centers due to the billing via DRG. This situation was confirmed in the first publications after introduction of the DRG, showing a clearly deficient level of care of polytrauma cases. Over the years, adjustments have led to an improvement in the remuneration for polytraumatized patients. In the emergency room, polytrauma is not always the final diagnosis. A considerable proportion of patients are only slightly injured, but must be admitted via the emergency room due to the circumstances of the accident or suspected diagnosis at the scene of the accident to exclude life-threatening injuries. In this study, patients with the billing diagnosis of mild craniocerebral trauma were selected as an example. The proportion of these patients was 22% during the period of observation in 2017. For these patients, the proportional costs during treatment were calculated. It could be shown that 60.36% of the costs during a 2‑day treatment of these patients were incurred in the emergency room. Costs for material and personnel could not be considered. Despite not including these expenses, the costs were never covered for any of these patients. For patients with slight injuries after trauma management in the emergency room, the present adjustments to the DRG system by increasing the basic case value seem to be insufficient. Additional remuneration for these patients seems absolutely justified to further ensure adequate quality of care.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionCosts and Cost AnalysisCraniocerebral TraumaDiagnosis-Related GroupsEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationHumansMultiple TraumaTrauma CentersCraniocerebral traumaEmergency roomHealth economicsPolytraumaTrauma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.