Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30306093›Full record

ReviewJournal of immunology research2018

Viral and Nonviral Engineering of Natural Killer Cells as Emerging Adoptive Cancer Immunotherapies.

Sandro Matosevic

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of immunology research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Engineering of potent CAR NK cells using non-viral Sleeping Beauty transposition from minimalistic DNA vectors.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Breast cancer immunotherapy: a comprehensive review.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023
    Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandro MatosevicPurdue University, Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5118-2455
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells are powerful immune effectors whose antitumor activity is regulated through a sophisticated network of activating and inhibitory receptors. As effectors of cancer immunotherapy, NK cells are attractive as they do not attack healthy self-tissues nor do they induce T cell-driven inflammatory cytokine storm, enabling their use as allogeneic adoptive cellular therapies. Clinical responses to adoptive NK-based immunotherapy have been thwarted, however, by the profound immunosuppression induced by the tumor microenvironment, particularly severe in the context of solid tumors. In addition, the short postinfusion persistence of NK cells

Indexed as

AnimalsCancer VaccinesCellular Reprogramming TechniquesGenetic EngineeringGenetic VectorsHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveKiller Cells, NaturalNeoplasmsVirusesCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID30306093
PMCPMC6166361
OpenAlexW2890799178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.