Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30305919›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2018

Using a peanut ball during labour versus not using a peanut ball during labour for women using an epidural: study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study.

Virginia Stulz, David Campbell, Biing Yin, Wafa Al Omari, Robin Burr, Heather Reilly, Kenny Lawson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07333209 (Determine the Impact of Scheduled Positioning With a Peanutball on Labor Outcomes Among Primiparous Women Under Epidural Analgesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07333209 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Determine the Impact of Scheduled Positioning With a Peanutball on Labor Outcomes Among Primiparous Women Under Epidural Analgesia: A Non-Invasive Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHamad Medical CorporationRan2026 to 2026Enrolled110ConditionsLabor (Obstetrics)--ComplicationsArmsScheduled Maternal Positioning with use of peanutball
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Virginia StulzSchool of Nursing and Midwifery Centre for Nursing and Midwifery Research, Nepean Hospital, 1st level Court Building, Derby St, Kingswood, NSW 2340 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0275-8531
David Campbell2Nepean Hospital, Derby St, Kingswood, NSW 2340 Australia.
Biing YinLithgow Hospital, Corner Col Drewe Drive and Great Western Highway, Lithgow, NSW 2790 Australia.
Wafa Al Omari2Nepean Hospital, Derby St, Kingswood, NSW 2340 Australia.
Robin Burr2Nepean Hospital, Derby St, Kingswood, NSW 2340 Australia.
Heather ReillyCentre for Nursing and Midwifery Research, Nepean Hospital, 1st level Court Building, Derby St, Kingswood, NSW 2340 Australia.
Kenny LawsonTranslational Health Research Institute, Building 3, David Pilgrim Avenue, Campbelltown, NSW 2560 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe peanut ball has only been recently used as a support for women labouring with epidurals. The peanut ball is shaped like a peanut and fits snugly between the woman's legs so that both legs are maintained as opening the pelvic outlet to increase the progress of labour and facilitate descent of the fetal head. Using position changes during labour to enhance widening of the pelvic outlet can be beneficial but a woman who has an epidural is limited in the number of positions she can adopt. No randomised controlled trial has been implemented in Australia to establish the effectiveness of a peanut ball specifically for women using epidurals during labour, and this project addresses this gap. The main aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility and practicality of conducting and replicating this trial to a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT).

methodsA minimum number of 50 women (25 in each trial arm), who are using an epidural in labour at two hospitals in NSW over a 1-year period, will be recruited and randomly allocated into a group that uses the peanut ball or into a group that does not use the peanut ball. Primary study objectives include assessing the proportion of women willing to be randomised, retention/attrition rates, and with associated reasons. Data will be collected on key clinical outcomes (natural birth rate, length of stay) with means and variances estimated between trial arms. This will inform the appropriate powering of a future definitive RCT. Secondary study objectives will include investigating the completion and acceptability of health and satisfaction surveys and assess the feasibility of conducting an economic evaluation alongside a future trial. DISCUSSION: This is a two-armed randomised controlled pilot trial. Outcomes from this pilot will inform a larger trial at a tertiary hospital.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12618000662268.

Indexed as

EpiduralLabourPeanut ball

Identifiers

PMID30305919
PMCPMC6171141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.