Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30305850›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2018

Prolonged-release fampridine in multiple sclerosis: clinical data and real-world experience. Report of an expert meeting.

Philipp Albrecht, Ingrid Kristine Bjørnå, David Brassat, Rachel Farrell, Peter Feys, Jeremy Hobart, Raymond Hupperts, Michael Linnebank, Jožef Magdič, Celia Oreja-Guevara and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Fampridine improves acute optic neuritis contributing to a long-lasting recovery of nerve function.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 13 institutions in 10 countries.

Philipp AlbrechtDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.
Ingrid Kristine BjørnåNeurological Department, Drammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken, Drammen, Norway.
David BrassatCentre de Resource et de Competence-SEP CHU-Toulouse et UMR1043, Université de Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Rachel FarrellDepartment of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Peter FeysREVAL/BIOMED, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Jeremy HobartDepartment of Clinical Trials and Health Research: Translational & Stratified Medicine, Plymouth.
Raymond HuppertsDepartment of Neurology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands.
Michael LinnebankDepartment of Neurology, Helios Clinic Hagen-Ambrock, Hagen, Germany.
Jožef MagdičDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Celia Oreja-GuevaraNeurología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
Carlo PozzilliDepartment of Neurology, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Antonio Vasco SalgadoServiço de Neurologia, Hospital Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, Portugal.
Tjalf ZiemssenCenter of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, MS Center Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Drammen Hospital · NOHasselt University · BEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHelios Klinik Hagen Ambrock · DEHospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca · PTNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBPeninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry · GBSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRUniversity Clinical Centre Maribor · SIUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prolonged-release (PR) fampridine is the only approved medication to improve walking in multiple sclerosis (MS), having been shown to produce a clinically meaningful improvement in walking ability in the subset of MS patients with Expanded Disability Status Scale 4-7. Recent responder subgroup analyses in the phase III ENHANCE study show a large effect size in terms of an increase of 20.58 points on the patient-reported 12-item MS Walking Scale in the 43% of patients classified as responders to PR-fampridine, corresponding to a standardized response mean of 1.68. Use of PR-fampridine in clinical practice varies across Europe, depending partly on whether it is reimbursed. A group of European MS experts met in June 2017 to discuss their experience with using PR-fampridine, including their views on the patient population for treatment, assessment of treatment response, re-testing and re-treatment, and stopping criteria. This article summarizes the experts' opinions on how PR-fampridine can be used in real-world clinical practice to optimize the benefits to people with MS with impaired walking ability.

Indexed as

multiple sclerosisprolonged-release fampridinereal-world experiencetreatment responsewalking ability

Identifiers

PMID30305850
PMCPMC6174649
OpenAlexW2895375125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.