Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30305801›Full record

ArticleBMC clinical pathology2018

Prognostic significance of p16 & p53 immunohistochemical expression in triple negative breast cancer.

Atif Ali Hashmi, Samreen Naz, Shumaila Kanwal Hashmi, Zubaida Fida Hussain, Muhammad Irfan, Erum Yousuf Khan, Naveen Faridi, Amir Khan, Muhammad Muzzammil Edhi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC clinical pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Atif Ali Hashmi1Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Samreen Naz1Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shumaila Kanwal HashmiCMH Institute of Medical Sciences, Multan, Pakistan.
Zubaida Fida Hussain1Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Irfan1Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Erum Yousuf Khan1Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Naveen Faridi1Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Amir Khan3Kandahar University, North, Kandahar 3802 Afghanistan.ORCID 0000-0002-8763-7690
Muhammad Muzzammil Edhi4Brown University, Providence, RI USA.
Liaquat National Hospital · PKBrown University · USKandahar University · AFNishtar Medical College and Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: p16 and p53 genes are frequently mutated in triple negative breast cancer & prognostic value of these mutations have been shown; however, their role as immunohistochemical overexpression has not been fully validated. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the association of p16 and p53 overexpression in triple negative breast cancer with various prognostic parameters. Methods: Total 150 cases of triple negative breast cancers were selected from records of pathology department archives that underwent surgeries at Liaquat National hospital, Karachi from January 2008 till December 2013. ER, PR and Her2neu immunohistochemistry were re-performed to confirm triple negative status. p16 & p53 immunohistochemistry was performed on all cases and association with various clinicopathologic parameters was determined. Results: Mean age of the patients involved in the study was 48.9 years. Most of the patients presented at stage T2 with a high mean ki67 index i.e. 46.9%. 42.7% of cases had nodal metastasis. Although 84% cases were of invasive ductal carcinoma; however a significant proportion of cases were of metaplastic histology (9.3%). Fifty-one percent (76 cases) of cases showed positive p53 expression while 49% (74 cases) were negative. Higher percentage of p53 expression was found to correlate with higher T stage, high ki67 index and higher nodal stage. On the other hand, strong intensity of p53 expression was positively correlated with higher tumor grade and ki67 index. Seventy-one percent (98 cases) of cases showed positive p16 expression, whereas 24.8% (34 cases) were negative and 3.6% (5 cases) showed focal positive p16 expression. However, no significant association was found between p16 expression and various clinical and pathologic parameters. Similarly, no significant association of either p16 or p53 over-expression was noted with recurrence status of patients. Conclusion: On the basis of significant association of p53 over-expression with worse prognostic factors in triple negative breast cancer, therefore we suggest that more large scale studies are needed to validate this finding in loco-regional population. Moreover, high expression of p16 in triple negative breast cancer suggests a potential role of this biomarker in triple negative breast cancer pathogenesis which should be investigated with molecular based research in our population.

Indexed as

p16p53Triple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID30305801
PMCPMC6171321
OpenAlexW2895260375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.