ArticleBMC clinical pathology2018
Prognostic significance of p16 & p53 immunohistochemical expression in triple negative breast cancer.
Article in BMC clinical pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- A prospective phase II clinical trial identifying the optimal regimen for carboplatin plus standard backbone of anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022Trial
- Immunohistochemical Evaluation of p53 and Its Association With Prognostic Parameters in Breast Cancer.Cureus · 2026Article
- Immunohistochemical Characterization of a Large Cohort of Triple Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of surgical pathology · 2024Article
- The Prognostic Significance of P16 Immunohistochemical Expression Pattern in Women with Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma.Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2023Article
- P16 Expression in Human Breast Carcinoma and its Relationship to Clinicopathological Parameters.Advanced biomedical research · 2023Article
- MASTL is enriched in cancerous and pluripotent stem cells and influences OCT1/OCT4 levels.iScience · 2022Article
- Quantitative single-cell analysis of immunofluorescence protein multiplex images illustrates biomarker spatial heterogeneity within breast cancer subtypes.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2021Article
- Investigation of p16 protein expression and its association with histopathologic parameters in breast cancer.Molecular biology research communications · 2021Article
- Expression of p53 and p16 in Carcinoma Breast Tissue: Depicts Prognostic Significance or Coincidence.Cureus · 2021Article
- p53, p21, and cyclin d1 protein expression patterns in patients with breast cancer.Veterinary world · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Clinical Significance of Receptor-Interacting Protein 3 and Parkin, Essential Molecules for Necroptosis, in Breast Cancer.Journal of breast cancer · 2021Article
- Article
- Outcomes of Harmonic Scalpel and Electrocautery in Patients Who Underwent Modified Radical Mastectomy.Cureus · 2020Article
- Encapsulated Papillary Carcinoma of Breast: Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Parameters.Cureus · 2020Article
- Positive correlation between programmed death ligand-1 and p53 in triple-negative breast cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2019Article
- Clinical, Histopathological, and Immunohistochemical Characteristics of Predictive Biomarkers of Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: p16 and p53 genes are frequently mutated in triple negative breast cancer & prognostic value of these mutations have been shown; however, their role as immunohistochemical overexpression has not been fully validated. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the association of p16 and p53 overexpression in triple negative breast cancer with various prognostic parameters. Methods: Total 150 cases of triple negative breast cancers were selected from records of pathology department archives that underwent surgeries at Liaquat National hospital, Karachi from January 2008 till December 2013. ER, PR and Her2neu immunohistochemistry were re-performed to confirm triple negative status. p16 & p53 immunohistochemistry was performed on all cases and association with various clinicopathologic parameters was determined. Results: Mean age of the patients involved in the study was 48.9 years. Most of the patients presented at stage T2 with a high mean ki67 index i.e. 46.9%. 42.7% of cases had nodal metastasis. Although 84% cases were of invasive ductal carcinoma; however a significant proportion of cases were of metaplastic histology (9.3%). Fifty-one percent (76 cases) of cases showed positive p53 expression while 49% (74 cases) were negative. Higher percentage of p53 expression was found to correlate with higher T stage, high ki67 index and higher nodal stage. On the other hand, strong intensity of p53 expression was positively correlated with higher tumor grade and ki67 index. Seventy-one percent (98 cases) of cases showed positive p16 expression, whereas 24.8% (34 cases) were negative and 3.6% (5 cases) showed focal positive p16 expression. However, no significant association was found between p16 expression and various clinical and pathologic parameters. Similarly, no significant association of either p16 or p53 over-expression was noted with recurrence status of patients. Conclusion: On the basis of significant association of p53 over-expression with worse prognostic factors in triple negative breast cancer, therefore we suggest that more large scale studies are needed to validate this finding in loco-regional population. Moreover, high expression of p16 in triple negative breast cancer suggests a potential role of this biomarker in triple negative breast cancer pathogenesis which should be investigated with molecular based research in our population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.