ArticleScientific reports2018
Uni- and triaxial accelerometric signals agree during daily routine, but show differences between sports.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity in Individuals With Bipolar Disorder: An Evidence Synthesis and Position Statement From the ISBD Nutrition and Exercise Task Force (NExT).Bipolar disorders · 2026Review
- Examining the Role of Wearables in Inflammatory Arthritis Care: A Narrative Literature Review.The Journal of rheumatology · 2026Review
- Comparison of ActiGraph CentrePoint Insight Watch Placement on Dominant and Nondominant Wrists in Young Adults in Free-Living Conditions: Observational Validation Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Observational
- Associations of step accelerations and cardiometabolic risk markers in early adulthood.European journal of public health · 2025Article
- Objectively Measured Physical Activity Is Lower in Individuals with Normal Weight Obesity in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Comparison of chest- and wrist-based actigraphy in pulmonary arterial hypertension.European heart journal. Digital health · 2022Article
- Assessment of Physical Activity in Adults Using Wrist Accelerometers.Epidemiologic reviews · 2022Review
- Advanced analytical methods to assess physical activity behavior using accelerometer time series: A scoping review.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2022Article
- Article
- Deep Learning-Based Optimal Smart Shoes Sensor Selection for Energy Expenditure and Heart Rate Estimation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Step detection and energy expenditure at different speeds by three accelerometers in a controlled environment.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Using Accelerometry for Evaluating Energy Consumption and Running Intensity Distribution Throughout a Marathon According to Sex.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Estimation of energy consumed by middle-aged recreational marathoners during a marathon using accelerometry-based devices.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Physical activity levels in adults and elderly from triaxial and uniaxial accelerometry. The Tromsø Study.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accelerometers objectively monitor physical activity, and ongoing research suggests they can also detect patterns of body movement. However, different types of signal (uniaxial, captured by older studies, vs. the newer triaxial) and or/device (validated Actigraph used by older studies, vs. others) may lead to incomparability of results from different time periods. Standardization is desirable. We establish whether uniaxial signals adequately monitor routine activity, and whether triaxial accelerometry can detect sport-specific variations in movement pattern. 1402 adolescents wore triaxial Actigraphs (GT3X) for one week and diaried sport. Uni- and triaxial counts per minute were compared across the week and between over 30 different sports. Across the whole recording period 95% of variance in triaxial counts was explained by the vertical axis (5th percentile for R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.