Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30305467›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2019

ELISA using a recombinant chimera of ESAT-6/MPB70/MPB83 for Mycobacterium bovis diagnosis in naturally infected cattle.

Ingrid Ieda Fernando de Souza, Rudielle de Arruda Rodrigues, Kláudia Santos Gonçalves Jorge, Márcio Roberto Silva, Walter Lilenbaum, Carlos Eugênio Soto Vidal, Rodrigo Nestor Etges, Miladin Kostovic, Flábio Ribeiro Araújo

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ingrid Ieda Fernando de SouzaPostgraduate Program in Biotechnology and Biodiversity of the Central Western Region, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS 79070-900, Brazil.
Rudielle de Arruda RodriguesPostgraduate Program in Veterinary Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine (FAMEZ), Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS 79070-900, Brazil.
Kláudia Santos Gonçalves JorgePostgraduate Program in Veterinary Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine (FAMEZ), Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS 79070-900, Brazil.
Márcio Roberto SilvaEmbrapa Dairy Cattle, Juiz de Fora, MG 36038-330, Brazil.
Walter LilenbaumLaboratory of Veterinary Bacteriology, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, RJ 24. 210-130, Brazil.
Carlos Eugênio Soto VidalRegional Technical Unit for Agriculture, Livestock and Supply of Santa Maria (UTRA), Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply, Santa Maria, RS 97050-500, Brazil.
Rodrigo Nestor EtgesSecretary of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation (SEAPI), State Government of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS 90150-900, Brazil.
Miladin KostovicEllie Lab., Germantown, WI 53022, U.S.A.
Flábio Ribeiro AraújoEmbrapa Beef Cattle, Campo Grande, MS 79106-550, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRGoverno do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul · BRMinistry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Food Supply · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) control programs generally rely on intradermal tuberculin tests for the antemortem diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle, but these tests detect only a portion of the infected animals. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic coverage of a combination of the bTB antemortem techniques known as the comparative intradermal tuberculin test (CITT) and an ELISA based on a recombinant chimera of ESAT-6/MPB70/MPB83 as the antigen in cattle. The results were compared to postmortem findings based on M. bovis culturing and PCR. Paired comparisons of all data (n=92) demonstrated that ELISA and LST results compared to the culturing results did not present significant differences (P=0.27 on McNemar's test and P=0.12 on Fisher's exact test, respectively). Using culturing as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were 79.5% (95% CI: 64.5-89.2%) and 75.5% (95% CI: 62.4-85.1%), respectively, whereas LST demonstrated 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 91.03-100%) and 92.5% specificity (95% CI: 82.1-97.0%). The ELISA results did not reveal significant differences in relation to the LST results (P>0.99 on Fisher's exact test). Using the latter as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were 79.1% (95% CI: 64.8-88.6%) and 79.6% (95% CI: 66.4-88.5%), respectively. The use of ELISA with the recombinant chimera of ESAT-6/MPB70/MPB83 as the antigen complements the diagnostic coverage provided by CITT and increases the removal of infected animals from herds.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsCattleCattle DiseasesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayMembrane ProteinsMycobacterium bovisRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTuberculosis, BovineAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMPB70 protein, Mycobacterium bovisMPB83 protein, MycobacteriumRecombinant Fusion Proteinsbovine tuberculosiscomparative intradermal tuberculin testELISAMycobacterium bovis

Identifiers

PMID30305467
PMCPMC6361649
OpenAlexW2896929070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.