Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30305440›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Wild chimpanzees select tool material based on efficiency and knowledge.

Noemie Lamon, Christof Neumann, Jennifer Gier, Klaus Zuberbühler, Thibaud Gruber

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The effect of habitat health and environmental change on cultural diversity and richness in animals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Efficiency fosters cumulative culture across species.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. DNA barcoding identifies cryptic animal tool materials.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Noemie LamonDepartment of Comparative Cognition, University of Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland noemie.lamon@gmail.com.
Christof NeumannDepartment of Comparative Cognition, University of Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0236-1219
Jennifer GierDepartment of Comparative Cognition, University of Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Klaus ZuberbühlerDepartment of Comparative Cognition, University of Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Thibaud GruberBudongo Conservation Field Station, Masindi, Uganda thibaud.gruber@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6766-3947
University of Neuchâtel · CHUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some animals have basic culture, but to date there is not much evidence that cultural traits evolve as part of a cumulative process as seen in humans. This may be due to limits in animal physical cognition, such as an inability to compare the efficiency of a novel behavioural innovation with an already existing tradition. We investigated this possibility with a study on a natural tool innovation in wild chimpanzees: moss-sponging, which recently emerged in some individuals to extract mineral-rich liquids at a natural clay-pit. The behaviour probably arose as a variant of leaf-sponging, a tool technique seen in all studied chimpanzee communities. We found that moss-sponges not only absorbed more liquid but were manufactured and used more rapidly than leaf-sponges, suggesting a functional improvement. To investigate whether chimpanzees understood the advantage of moss- over leaf-sponges, we experimentally offered small amounts of rainwater in an artificial cavity of a portable log, together with both sponge materials, moss and leaves. We found that established moss-spongers (having used both leaves and moss to make sponges) preferred moss to prepare a sponge to access the rainwater, whereas leaf-spongers (never observed using moss) preferred leaves. Survey data finally demonstrated that moss was common in forest areas near clay-pits but nearly absent in other forest areas, suggesting that natural moss-sponging was at least partly constrained by ecology. Together, these results suggest that chimpanzees perceive functional improvements in tool quality, a crucial prerequisite for cumulative culture.

Indexed as

CognitionFeeding BehaviorTool Use BehaviorAnimalsFemaleMalePan troglodytesSocial BehaviorUgandaefficiencyfield experimentPan troglodytes schweinfurthiispongessubculturetool use

Identifiers

PMID30305440
PMCPMC6191692
OpenAlexW2897377083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.