ArticleJMIR medical informatics2018
Utilization of Electronic Medical Records and Biomedical Literature to Support the Diagnosis of Rare Diseases Using Data Fusion and Collaborative Filtering Approaches.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development, Implementation, and Preliminary Results of a Novel Social Network for Rare Disease Communities: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- An electronic medical record retrieval system can be used to identify missed diagnosis in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia.Journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
- An artificial intelligence-based approach for identifying rare disease patients using retrospective electronic health records applied for Pompe disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Clinical study applying machine learning to detect a rare disease: results and lessons learned.JAMIA open · 2022Article
- Knowledge-based approaches to drug discovery for rare diseases.Drug discovery today · 2022Review
- Leveraging Open Electronic Health Record Data and Environmental Exposures Data to Derive Insights Into Rare Pulmonary Disease.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Article
- Use, Impact, Weaknesses, and Advanced Features of Search Functions for Clinical Use in Electronic Health Records: A Scoping Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
- Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for rare diseases: a qualitative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Reconstruction of the Cytokine Signaling in Lysosomal Storage Diseases by Literature Mining and Network Analysis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Diagnosis of Rare Diseases: a scoping review of clinical decision support systems.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Article
- Diagnosis support systems for rare diseases: a scoping review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Article
- Article
- Improving rare disease classification using imperfect knowledge graph.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- Review
- Eidikology: proposition for a new terminology for the science of rare diseases.Postgraduate medical journal · 2019Article
- Patients' and Doctors' Perceptions of a Mobile Phone-Based Consultation Service for Maternal, Neonatal, and Infant Health Care in Bangladesh: A Mixed-Methods Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
- Rare disease knowledge enrichment through a data-driven approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the United States, a rare disease is characterized as the one affecting no more than 200,000 patients at a certain period. Patients suffering from rare diseases are often either misdiagnosed or left undiagnosed, possibly due to insufficient knowledge or experience with the rare disease on the part of clinical practitioners. With an exponentially growing volume of electronically accessible medical data, a large volume of information on thousands of rare diseases and their potentially associated diagnostic information is buried in electronic medical records (EMRs) and medical literature.
objectiveThis study aimed to leverage information contained in heterogeneous datasets to assist rare disease diagnosis. Phenotypic information of patients existed in EMRs and biomedical literature could be fully leveraged to speed up diagnosis of diseases.
methodsIn our previous work, we advanced the use of a collaborative filtering recommendation system to support rare disease diagnostic decision making based on phenotypes derived solely from EMR data. However, the influence of using heterogeneous data with collaborative filtering was not discussed, which is an essential problem while facing large volumes of data from various resources. In this study, to further investigate the performance of collaborative filtering on heterogeneous datasets, we studied EMR data generated at Mayo Clinic as well as published article abstracts retrieved from the Semantic MEDLINE Database. Specifically, in this study, we designed different data fusion strategies from heterogeneous resources and integrated them with the collaborative filtering model.
resultsWe evaluated performance of the proposed system using characterizations derived from various combinations of EMR data and literature, as well as with sole EMR data. We extracted nearly 13 million EMRs from the patient cohort generated between 2010 and 2015 at Mayo Clinic and retrieved all article abstracts from the semistructured Semantic MEDLINE Database that were published till the end of 2016. We applied a collaborative filtering model and compared the performance generated by different metrics. Log likelihood ratio similarity combined with k-nearest neighbor on heterogeneous datasets showed the optimal performance in patient recommendation with area under the precision-recall curve (PRAUC) 0.475 (string match), 0.511 (systematized nomenclature of medicine [SNOMED] match), and 0.752 (Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center [GARD] match). Log likelihood ratio similarity also performed the best with mean average precision 0.465 (string match), 0.5 (SNOMED match), and 0.749 (GARD match). Performance of rare disease prediction was also demonstrated by using the optimal algorithm. Macro-average F-measure for string, SNOMED, and GARD match were 0.32, 0.42, and 0.63, respectively.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated potential utilization of heterogeneous datasets in a collaborative filtering model to support rare disease diagnosis. In addition to phenotypic-based analysis, in the future, we plan to further resolve the heterogeneity issue and reduce miscommunication between EMR and literature by mining genotypic information to establish a comprehensive disease-phenotype-gene network for rare disease diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.