Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30305261›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2018

Utilization of Electronic Medical Records and Biomedical Literature to Support the Diagnosis of Rare Diseases Using Data Fusion and Collaborative Filtering Approaches.

Feichen Shen, Sijia Liu, Yanshan Wang, Andrew Wen, Liwei Wang, Hongfang Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Improving rare disease classification using imperfect knowledge graph.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rare disease knowledge enrichment through a data-driven approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Feichen ShenDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7803-2331
Sijia LiuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9763-1164
Yanshan WangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4433-7839
Andrew WenDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9090-8028
Liwei WangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9970-8604
Hongfang LiuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2570-3741
Mayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Open Health Natural Language Processing CollaboratoryU01TR002062 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, LIU, HONGFANG · 2017 to 2021
$7.6M
Biomedical Data Translator Technical Feasibility Assessment and Architecture DesignOT3TR002019 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHUTE, CHRISTOPHER G, HAENDEL, MELISSA A · 2016 to 2019
$5.7M
Semi-structured Information Retrieval in Clinical Text for Cohort IdentificationR01LM011934 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI HERSH, WILLIAM R, LIU, HONGFANG · 2014 to 2025
$5.1M
Secondary use of EMRs for surgical complication surveillanceR01EB019403 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LIU, HONGFANG, STORLIE, CURTIS · 2015 to 2022
$3.8M
Natural language processing for clinical and translational researchR01GM102282 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LIU, HONGFANG, PAKHOMOV, SERGUEI VS · 2013 to 2016
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS OT3 TR002019NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002062NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019403NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102282NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United States, a rare disease is characterized as the one affecting no more than 200,000 patients at a certain period. Patients suffering from rare diseases are often either misdiagnosed or left undiagnosed, possibly due to insufficient knowledge or experience with the rare disease on the part of clinical practitioners. With an exponentially growing volume of electronically accessible medical data, a large volume of information on thousands of rare diseases and their potentially associated diagnostic information is buried in electronic medical records (EMRs) and medical literature.

objectiveThis study aimed to leverage information contained in heterogeneous datasets to assist rare disease diagnosis. Phenotypic information of patients existed in EMRs and biomedical literature could be fully leveraged to speed up diagnosis of diseases.

methodsIn our previous work, we advanced the use of a collaborative filtering recommendation system to support rare disease diagnostic decision making based on phenotypes derived solely from EMR data. However, the influence of using heterogeneous data with collaborative filtering was not discussed, which is an essential problem while facing large volumes of data from various resources. In this study, to further investigate the performance of collaborative filtering on heterogeneous datasets, we studied EMR data generated at Mayo Clinic as well as published article abstracts retrieved from the Semantic MEDLINE Database. Specifically, in this study, we designed different data fusion strategies from heterogeneous resources and integrated them with the collaborative filtering model.

resultsWe evaluated performance of the proposed system using characterizations derived from various combinations of EMR data and literature, as well as with sole EMR data. We extracted nearly 13 million EMRs from the patient cohort generated between 2010 and 2015 at Mayo Clinic and retrieved all article abstracts from the semistructured Semantic MEDLINE Database that were published till the end of 2016. We applied a collaborative filtering model and compared the performance generated by different metrics. Log likelihood ratio similarity combined with k-nearest neighbor on heterogeneous datasets showed the optimal performance in patient recommendation with area under the precision-recall curve (PRAUC) 0.475 (string match), 0.511 (systematized nomenclature of medicine [SNOMED] match), and 0.752 (Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center [GARD] match). Log likelihood ratio similarity also performed the best with mean average precision 0.465 (string match), 0.5 (SNOMED match), and 0.749 (GARD match). Performance of rare disease prediction was also demonstrated by using the optimal algorithm. Macro-average F-measure for string, SNOMED, and GARD match were 0.32, 0.42, and 0.63, respectively.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated potential utilization of heterogeneous datasets in a collaborative filtering model to support rare disease diagnosis. In addition to phenotypic-based analysis, in the future, we plan to further resolve the heterogeneity issue and reduce miscommunication between EMR and literature by mining genotypic information to establish a comprehensive disease-phenotype-gene network for rare disease diagnosis.

Indexed as

electronic medical recordliteraturerare diseasestext mining

Identifiers

PMID30305261
PMCPMC6231873
OpenAlexW2891377710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.