ArticleBMC research notes2018
Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin B resistance among clinical isolates of staphylococci in southwest of Iran.
Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic resistance and factors associated with colonization dynamics ofEpidemiology and infection · 2025Article
- Methicillin and inducible clindamycin resistance in clinicalFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial resistance markers distribution in Staphylococcus aureus from Nsukka, Nigeria.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Genetic diversity of macrolides resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates and the potential synergistic effect of vitamins, C and KBMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Prevalence and Clindamycin Resistance Profile ofInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Mupirocin-ResistantBioMed research international · 2022Article
- Staphylococcus aureus with inducible clindamycin resistance and methicillin resistance in a tertiary hospital in Nepal.Tropical medicine and health · 2021Article
- Mechanisms of Resistance to Macrolide Antibiotics amongAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Evaluation of Biofilm Formation and Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Strains ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Inducible clindamycin resistance andFuture science OA · 2020Article
- Coagulase-negative staphylococci in outpatient routines: the implications of switching from CLSI to BrCAST/EUCAST guidelines.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020Article
- Characteristics of methicillin-resistantNew microbes and new infections · 2020Article
- Prevalence, Genetic Diversity, and Temporary Shifts of Inducible Clindamycin ResistanceFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Molecular Characterization, Drug Resistance and Virulence Analysis of Constitutive and Inducible Clindamycin ResistanceInfection and drug resistance · 2020Article
- Resistance profile to antimicrobials agents in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from hospitals in South Brazil between 2014-2019.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2020Article
- Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Healthy Turkeys in Egypt: First Report of Linezolid Resistance.Microorganisms · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe present study aimed to determine the phenotypic and genotypic profile of macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin B (MLS
resultsThis cross-sectional study was conducted on 164 non-duplicated staphylococci isolates collected during August 2015 to February 2016 from two tertiary care hospitals in Shiraz, southwest of Iran. Of the 164 isolates, 86 erythromycin-resistant isolates consist of 35 Staphylococcus aureus and 51 coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) were included in the study. Of the 35 S. aureus, the prevalence of cMLS (constitutive), iMLS (inducible), and MS phenotypes were found 82.9%, 8.6% and 8.6%, respectively. Among 51 CoNS, the frequencies of cMLS, iMLS, and MS phenotypes were detected 66.7%, 11.8% and 21.6%, respectively. Among S. aureus isolates, the predominant genes were ermC in 82.9% isolates, followed by ermA in 57.1% and msrA in 28.6% of isolates. Among CoNS isolates, the most frequent genes were diagnosed ermC in 70.6% isolates followed by msrA in 68.6% and ermA in 11.8% of isolates. In conclusion, regarding the presence of MLS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.