Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30305154›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2018

Prophylactic management of postpartum haemorrhage in the third stage of labour: an overview of systematic reviews.

Yuko Masuzawa, Yaeko Kataoka, Kana Fujii, Satomi Inoue

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05758012 (Undesired Effects of Carbetocin Compared To Oxytocin Administered As Single Intravenous Dose or Infusion During Cesarean Delivery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05758012 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Undesired Effects of Carbetocin Compared To Oxytocin Administered As Single Intravenous Dose or Infusion During Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled260ConditionsCesarean DeliveryArmsoxytocin, Carbetocin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuko MasuzawaGraduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, 10-1, Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan. 14DN013@slcn.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-4629-2371
Yaeko KataokaSt. Luke's International University, 10-1, Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan.
Kana FujiiSt. Luke's International University, 10-1, Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan.
Satomi InoueGraduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, 10-1, Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan.
St. Luke's International University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostpartum haemorrhage is a direct cause of maternal death worldwide and usually occurs during the third stage of labour. Most women receive some type of prophylactic management, which may include pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions. The objective of this study was to summarize systematic reviews that assessed the effects of postpartum haemorrhage prophylactic management during the third stage of labour.

methodsWe applied the guidelines for conducting an overview of reviews from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify all relevant systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of prophylactic management of postpartum haemorrhage in the third stage of labour compared with no treatment, placebo, or another management technique. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality using a measurement tool to assess reviews and quality of evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation for primary outcomes, summarizing results narratively.

resultsWe identified 29 systematic reviews: 18 Cochrane and 11 non-Cochrane. Cochrane systematic reviews were high quality, while the quality of non-Cochrane systematic reviews varied. The following techniques suggested effective, third-stage interventions to reduce the incidence of severe postpartum haemorrhage: active management of the third stage of labour compared to physiological management, active management compared to expectant management, administration of oxytocin compared to placebo, and use of tranexamic acid compared to placebo. The following third-stage management approaches reduced the need for blood transfusion: active management compared to physiological management, active management compared to expectant management, oral misoprostol compared to placebo, and tranexamic acid compared to placebo.

conclusionsNo effective prophylactic management techniques were identified for maternal mortality. Most methods of effective prophylactic management of postpartum haemorrhage were supported by evidence; however, they were limited to low- or moderate-quality evidence, and high-quality studies are therefore needed. Outcome measures of the included systematic reviews varied. It is recommended that outcome measures in preventive postpartum haemorrhage intervention trials align with the World Health Organization guidelines. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42016049220 .

Indexed as

Pregnancy Trimester, ThirdFemaleHumansOxytocinPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyOxytocinOverview of systematic reviewPostpartum haemorrhagePreventionRandomized controlled trialSystematic reviewThird-stage labour

Identifiers

PMID30305154
PMCPMC6180398
OpenAlexW2896888946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.