Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30305150›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2018

Evaluation of methods to detect in vitro biofilm formation by staphylococcal clinical isolates.

Sarita Manandhar, Anjana Singh, Ajit Varma, Shanti Pandey, Neeraj Shrivastava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Niosome-loaded Tet-Amp against S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Novel [1,3,4]Thiadiazole[3,2-Marine drugs · 2024
    Article
  10. Bacterial Adaptive Memory in Methicillin-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Biofilm Formation byACS omega · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarita ManandharTri-Chandra Multiple College, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Anjana SinghCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Ajit VarmaAmity Institute of Microbial Technology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, UP, 201303, India.
Shanti PandeyThe University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, 39406, USA.
Neeraj ShrivastavaAmity Institute of Microbial Technology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, UP, 201303, India. nsrivastava1@amity.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStaphylococcus genus comprising both Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) are widely distributed in nature and can infect diversity of hosts. Indeed, staphylococci are the major pathogens causing biofilm associated infections caused by contaminated hospital indwelling devices. These infections are persistent in nature being highly refractory to various stresses including antibiotics. Implementation of efficient diagnostic techniques for the biofilm production would help minimize the disease burden. Thus, early detection of pathogenic strains producing biofilms warrant the utmost importance in diagnostic laboratories especially in resource limited settings.

resultAmong 375 isolates collected from different clinical specimens, 214 (57%) were identified as coagulase negative staphylococci and 161 (43%) S. aureus. Detection of In-vitro biofilm formation in these isolates were carried out by three commonly used phenotypic assays and a genotypic assay. While evaluating the results, tissue-culture method with supplemented glucose and sucrose showed the best correlation with the results of genotypic assay.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialBiofilmsCross-Sectional StudiesGenotypeHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNepalPhenotypeStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcusStaphylococcus aureusTertiary Care CentersBiofilmClinical specimensGenotypic assayPhenotypic assaysStaphylococcus spp.

Identifiers

PMID30305150
PMCPMC6180658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.